United Kingdom Judgment

Christine Riefa Class Representative Limited v Apple Inc. & Others [2025] CAT 34 (13 June 2025)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that the claimant established a prima facie case of abuse of dominance and that the claims were suitable for collective proceedings.

Court disposition

collective proceedings certified

Orders

  • The collective proceedings are certified to proceed against Apple Inc. and Others

02

Material facts

Parties

Christine Riefa Class Representative Limited

Claimant

Apple Inc.

Defendant

Others

Defendant

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Collective Proceedings / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The claimant argued that Apple Inc. abused its dominant position by imposing unfair terms and restricting competition, resulting in harm to consumers.
Respondent
Apple Inc. denied abuse of dominance, contending that its practices were lawful, pro-competitive, and that collective proceedings were not suitable.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act 1998, Article 102 TFEU

    Abuse of dominant position under UK and EU competition law

  2. 02

    Competition Appeal Tribunal Rules

    Criteria for certification of collective proceedings

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that the claimant established a prima facie case of abuse of dominance and that the claims were suitable for collective proceedings.

Court disposition

collective proceedings certified

  • The collective proceedings are certified to proceed against Apple Inc. and Others

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2025] CAT 34

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] United Kingdom Competition Appeals Tribunal You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Competition Appeals Tribunal >> Christine Riefa Class Representative Limited v Apple Inc. & Others [2025] CAT 34 (13 June 2025) URL: https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/CAT/2025/34.html Cite as: [2025] CAT 34 [ New search ] [ Printable PDF version ] [ Help ] Christine Riefa Class Representative Limited v Apple Inc. & Others [2025] CAT 34 (13 June 2025) A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : 34.pdf BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/CAT/2025/34.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Article 102 TFEU

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.