Sign in
United Kingdom Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

United Kingdom Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

United Kingdom decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Medical negligence [2026] UKPC 31

Aeden Balwah (by Shelly-Ann Balwah, his Mother and Next Friend) and Anor v Marwan Ahmad Alsayed Abdulla (Trinidad & Tobago)

The Privy Council restored dismissal of a medical negligence claim, holding the Court of Appeal should not have overturned the trial judge’s finding on timing or entered judgment on causation.

  • Appellate review of findings of fact
  • Pleadings and amendment of pleadings
  • Causation
  • Foetal heart rate monitoring
  • Misoprostol dosage
  • Medical-negligence
Read case analysis
Public law [2026] UKPC 29

Devendranath Hurnam v PV Veerabudren (Mauritius)

The Privy Council held that a Mauritian Intermediate Court judge had immunity from damages for words or gestures made in open court within jurisdiction.

  • Personal liability of a judge for words or gestures in open court
  • Reception of english common law into mauritian law
  • Interpretation of the public officers’ protection act 1957
  • Procedural requirements for suit against a magistrate
  • Judicial-immunity
  • Mauritius
Read case analysis
Employment law [2026] EAT 63

H Amin v Manchester Airport Group Plc & Anor (PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE)

H Amin v Manchester Airport Group Plc & Anor (PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE) [2026] EAT 63 (19 May 2026)

The EAT dismissed an appeal against strike-out for non-payment of deposit orders, refusing relief from sanctions, postponement, and bias allegations.

  • Strike out for non-payment of deposit
  • Relief from sanctions
  • Postponement of hearing
  • Apparent bias
  • Fair hearing
  • Employment-appeal-tribunal
Read case analysis
Tax law [2026] UKFTT 721 (TC)

Smartprice (NE) Ltd v Revenue and Customs (PROCEDURE - Disclosure - Application for general and specific disclosure)

Smartprice (NE) Ltd v Revenue and Customs (PROCEDURE - Disclosure - Application for general and specific disclosure) [2026] UKFTT 721 (TC) (15 May 2026)

The Tribunal refused Smartprice (NE) Ltd’s application for general and specific disclosure in a VAT appeal, holding the request was too broad and disproportionate.

  • Disclosure
  • Vat fraud
  • Kittel principle
  • Tribunal procedure
  • Proportionality in disclosure
  • Vat
Read case analysis
Tax law [2026] UKFTT 721

Smartprice (NE) Ltd v Revenue and Customs (PROCEDURE - Disclosure - Application for general and specific disclosure)

Smartprice (NE) Ltd v Revenue and Customs (PROCEDURE - Disclosure - Application for general and specific disclosure) [2026] UKFTT 721 (TC) (15 May 2026)

The Tribunal refused Smartprice’s request for wider disclosure in a VAT Kittel appeal, holding that the default disclosure regime remained appropriate and proportionate.

  • Disclosure
  • Vat fraud
  • Kittel principle
  • Tribunal procedure
  • Vat
  • Kittel-principle
Read case analysis
Tax law [2026] UKFTT 723 (TC)

Coates & Anor (t/a Ross Coates Solicitors) v Revenue and Customs (PROCEDURE - barring application - deliberate and contumelious non-compliance with directions by HMRC - no prejudice to appellant)

Coates & Anor (t/a Ross Coates Solicitors) v Revenue and Customs (PROCEDURE - barring application - deliberate and contumelious non-compliance with directions by HMRC - no prejudice to appellant) [2026] UKFTT 723 (TC) (15 May 2026)

The Tribunal dismissed an application to bar HMRC for not serving listing information on the appellant, holding the breach serious but not sufficiently prejudicial.

  • Non-compliance with tribunal directions
  • Sanctions for procedural breaches
  • Barring applications
  • Relief from sanctions
  • Tax-procedure
  • Tribunal-sanctions
Read case analysis
Tax law [2026] UKFTT 723

Coates & Anor (t/a Ross Coates Solicitors) v Revenue and Customs (PROCEDURE - barring application - deliberate and contumelious non-compliance with directions by HMRC - no prejudice to appellant)

Coates & Anor (t/a Ross Coates Solicitors) v Revenue and Customs (PROCEDURE - barring application - deliberate and contumelious non-compliance with directions by HMRC - no prejudice to appellant) [2026] UKFTT 723 (TC) (15 May 2026)

The Tax Chamber dismissed RCS’s application to bar HMRC for failing to serve listing information, finding the breach deliberate but not significant or prejudicial.

  • Non-compliance with tribunal directions
  • Barring applications
  • Relief from sanctions
  • Case management discretion
  • Barring-application
  • Non-compliance-with-directions
Read case analysis
Tax law [2026] UKFTT 679 (TC)

Bridgeman v Revenue and Customs (Application for permission to appeal out of time; Martland principles applied; permission granted)

Bridgeman v Revenue and Customs (Application for permission to appeal out of time; Martland principles applied; permission granted) [2026] UKFTT 679 (TC) (07 May 2026)

The First-tier Tribunal granted Mr Bridgeman permission to bring a late tax appeal, finding his delay arose from a genuine procedural mistake and that the balance favoured permission.

  • Late appeal
  • Statutory review
  • Closure notice
  • Procedural requirements
  • Late-appeal
  • Tax-appeals
Read case analysis
Employment law [2026] EAT 70

Harkins v Marks & Spencer Plc (Practice and Procedure)

Harkins v Marks & Spencer Plc (Practice and Procedure) [2026] EAT 70 (07 May 2026)

The Employment Appeal Tribunal held that respondents should rarely make submissions at Rule 3(10) hearings, except on narrow knockout points showing an appeal ground is unarguable.

  • Appeal procedure
  • Rule 3(10) hearings
  • Respondent submissions
  • Practice direction interpretation
  • Employment-appeal-tribunal
  • Rule-3-10-hearings
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

United Kingdom decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.