Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
United Kingdom decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Privy Council held that the employment contract validly provided for 13 instalments, including the statutory end-of-year gratuity, so the appeal failed.
Komeng v National Highways Ltd (Fixed-Term Employees Regulations) [2026] EAT 75 (20 May 2026)
The EAT held that less favourable treatment in access to training under the Fixed-Term Employees Regulations does not need a separate detriment finding.
H Amin v Manchester Airport Group Plc & Anor (PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE) [2026] EAT 63 (19 May 2026)
The EAT dismissed an appeal against strike-out for non-payment of deposit orders, refusing relief from sanctions, postponement, and bias allegations.
Car Sales Solutions Ltd v Riekstins (Practice and Procedure) [2026] EAT 72 (18 May 2026)
The EAT allowed CSS’s appeal against refusal of reconsideration, holding the Employment Tribunal failed to follow the required procedure and remitting reconsideration to a different judge.
A Nurse v Revenue and Customs (Employment income; Excessive travel expenses; Discovery assessments and closure notice; penalties for incorrect returns; careless conduct; special reduction; Barry Edwards considered; decision flawed; penalties reduced to NIL) [2026] UKFTT 722 (TC) (15 May 2026)
The tribunal upheld discovery assessments and a closure notice over disallowed home-to-work travel claims, but reduced all carelessness penalties to nil.
Robinson v Harris & Ors (Discrimination; harassment; victimisation; barrister) [2026] EAT 71 (12 May 2026)
The EAT dismissed a self-employed barrister’s appeal, holding that section 47 Equality Act 2010 was correctly treated as a jurisdictional gateway and that a stray reference to section 39 caused no error.
Tedd v Surrey County Council [2026] EAT 66 (12 May 2026)
The Employment Appeal Tribunal upheld strike out of an employment claim for not being actively pursued, finding the claimant had deliberately misled the tribunal.
Clifton Diocese v Parker [2026] EAT 68 (12 May 2026)
The EAT allowed the appeal in part, setting aside religion or belief discrimination and harassment findings for a fresh decision, while upholding unfair and wrongful dismissal findings.
The Privy Council restored the High Court’s dismissal of a fire officer’s promotion challenge, holding the executive sets qualifications and no equivalent-qualification determination was shown.
The Privy Council held that Fire Service promotion qualifications were set by the executive, not the PSC, and restored dismissal of Ian Green’s claim.
Explore more
