Sign in
United Kingdom Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

United Kingdom Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

United Kingdom decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Immigration law [2026] UKAITUR JR2025LON001902

JR2025LON001902

JR2025LON001902 [2026] UKAITUR JR2025LON001902 (07 May 2026)

The Upper Tribunal refused judicial review of a fee waiver refusal, holding that section 3C leave was not engaged because no completed human rights application was made.

  • Fee waiver applications
  • Section 3c leave
  • Procedural fairness
  • Guidance validity
  • Fee-waiver-applications
  • Section-3c-leave
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2026] UKAITUR JR2024LON002983

JR2024LON002983

JR2024LON002983 [2026] UKAITUR JR2024LON002983 (07 May 2026)

The Upper Tribunal quashed certification of a Sri Lankan myeloma patient’s human rights claim, holding the claim was not clearly unfounded.

  • Article 3 echr medical removal
  • Article 8 echr family life
  • Certification of human rights claims
  • Public law review
  • Immigration medical treatment
  • Immigration-law
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2026] UKAITUR JR2025LON000701

JR2025LON000701

JR2025LON000701 [2026] UKAITUR JR2025LON000701 (07 May 2026)

The Upper Tribunal quashed a Skilled Worker leave-curtailment decision, holding that voluntary work in a private takeaway was not permitted and that the interview process was procedurally unfair.

  • Skilled worker visa
  • Voluntary work
  • Procedural fairness
  • Curtailment of leave
  • Discretion in immigration decisions
  • Skilled-worker-visa
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2026] UKAITUR JR2025LON001050

JR2025LON001050

JR2025LON001050 [2026] UKAITUR JR2025LON001050 (30 April 2026)

Judicial review over an entry clearance vignette and removal was dismissed. The Tribunal held the vignette was issued in error and the refusal and removal were lawful.

  • Indefinite leave to enter
  • Entry clearance
  • Judicial review
  • Administrative error
  • Revocation of leave
  • Removal directions
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2026] UKAITUR JR2023LON002929

JR2023LON002929 & JR2024LON002724

JR2023LON002929 & JR2024LON002724 [2026] UKAITUR JR2023LON002929 (28 April 2026)

The Upper Tribunal dismissed two visa judicial review claims after finding the applicants likely relied on fraudulent documents and refused permission to appeal.

  • Judicial review of visa refusals
  • Fraudulent documents in immigration applications
  • Abuse of process
  • Professional obligations of solicitors
  • Withdrawal of judicial review applications
  • Judicial-review
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2026] UKAITUR UI2026000500

UI2026000500 & UI2026000502

UI2026000500 & UI2026000502 [2026] UKAITUR UI2026000500 (27 April 2026)

The Upper Tribunal upheld the First-tier Tribunal’s decision allowing two Ethiopian siblings’ entry clearance appeals under paragraph 297(i)(f) of the Immigration Rules.

  • Entry clearance
  • Paragraph 297 immigration rules
  • Serious and compelling family considerations
  • Article 8 echr
  • Adoption recognition
  • Entry-clearance
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2026] UKAITUR UI2025003611

UI2025003611

UI2025003611 [2026] UKAITUR UI2025003611 (27 April 2026)

Upper Tribunal allowed an adult dependent relative appeal, finding the appellant needed long-term personal care and could not reasonably obtain it in Tanzania.

  • Adult dependent relative
  • Article 8 echr
  • Entry clearance
  • Appendix adr
  • Material error of law
  • Adult-dependent-relative
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2026] UKAITUR UI2026000601

UI2026000601 & UI2026000602

UI2026000601 & UI2026000602 [2026] UKAITUR UI2026000601 (24 April 2026)

The Upper Tribunal set aside the First-tier Tribunal’s decision for material legal error in a sole-responsibility immigration appeal and remitted the case.

  • Appeal procedure
  • Material error of law
  • Remittal
  • Sole responsibility under paragraph 297(i)(e)
  • Immigration-law
  • Appeal-procedure
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2026] UKAITUR UI2025005813

UI2025005813

UI2025005813 [2026] UKAITUR UI2025005813 (24 April 2026)

The Upper Tribunal found the First-tier Tribunal acted unfairly by hearing an asylum appeal in the Secretary of State’s absence and remitted the case.

  • Procedural fairness
  • Representation at hearing
  • Internal relocation
  • Risk on return
  • Anonymity in asylum proceedings
  • Procedural-fairness
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

United Kingdom decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.