Sign in
United Kingdom Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

United Kingdom Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

United Kingdom decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Employment law [2026] EAT 58

Tarbuc v Martello Piling Ltd

Tarbuc v Martello Piling Ltd (TRIBUNAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - S.111A EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS ACT 1996) [2026] EAT 58 (28 April 2026)

The EAT held section 111A ERA 1996 applies only to unfair dismissal, not to the worker’s other claims, and found the tribunal’s improper-conduct reasoning incomplete.

  • Protected conversations
  • Section 111a employment rights act 1996
  • Unfair dismissal
  • Automatic unfair dismissal
  • Unlawful deduction from wages
  • Part-time worker discrimination
Read case analysis
Employment law [2026] EAT 39

The Laurels Family Assessment Ltd v Kay (PROTECTED DISCLOSURES)

The Laurels Family Assessment Ltd v Kay (PROTECTED DISCLOSURES) [2026] EAT 39 (10 March 2026)

The EAT dismissed the employer’s appeal, holding that the tribunal was entitled to find the claimant was automatically unfairly dismissed for protected disclosures.

  • Unfair dismissal
  • Protected disclosure
  • Whistleblowing
  • Detriment
  • Employment rights act 1996
  • Automatic unfair dismissal
Read case analysis
Employment law [2026] EAT 57

L Capeling v TFX Group Ltd (Whistleblowing)

L Capeling v TFX Group Ltd (Whistleblowing) [2026] EAT 57 (10 March 2026)

The Employment Appeal Tribunal dismissed a whistleblowing appeal, holding that the alleged disclosure lacked sufficient specificity and any belief in risk was unreasonable.

  • Whistleblowing
  • Protected disclosure
  • Automatic unfair dismissal
  • Detriment
  • Health and safety
  • Medical device regulation
Read case analysis
Employment law [2026] EAT 44

Manuel v Netduma Ltd (Practice and Procedure; Amendment)

Manuel v Netduma Ltd (Practice and Procedure; Amendment) [2026] EAT 44 (03 March 2026)

The EAT held that the claimant’s s.44 health and safety detriment claim was already pleaded in the ET1, so no amendment was needed and the refusal to amend was set aside.

  • Amendment of pleadings
  • Protected disclosures
  • Health and safety detriment
  • Employment rights act 1996 s.44
  • Automatic unfair dismissal
  • Employment-law
Read case analysis
Employment law [2024] EAT 193

Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council v Oliver (Rev1) (Unfair Dismissal - automatic unfair dismissal - s.99 Employment Rights Act 1996 - maternity rights - reg. 10 & 20(1)(b) Maternity and Parental Leave etc Regulations 1999)

Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council v Oliver (Rev1) (Unfair Dismissal - automatic unfair dismissal - s.99 Employment Rights Act 1996 - maternity rights - reg. 10 & 20(1)(b) Maternity and Parental Leave etc Regulations 1999) [2024] EAT 193 (20 December 2024)

The EAT allowed an employer’s appeal, holding that an automatic unfair dismissal claim under regulation 10 was not properly before the tribunal and should have been treated as an amendment.

  • Unfair dismissal
  • Automatic unfair dismissal
  • Maternity rights
  • Redundancy
  • Employment tribunal procedure
  • Amendment of claims
Read case analysis
Employment law [2024] EAT 154

Bashir v London Borough of Barking & Dagenham & Ors (Practice and Procedure - Sex Discrimination - Agency Worker)

Bashir v London Borough of Barking & Dagenham & Ors (Practice and Procedure - Sex Discrimination - Agency Worker) [2024] EAT 154 (26 September 2024)

The EAT set aside strike out decisions on Equality Act and agency worker claims, finding the tribunal gave inadequate analysis of agency, continuing acts, and time limits.

  • Agency worker rights
  • Sex discrimination
  • Race discrimination
  • Harassment
  • Victimisation
  • Automatic unfair dismissal
Read case analysis
Employment law [2024] EAT 167

Carnival PLC (t/a Carnival UK) v Hunter (Unfair Dismissal)

Carnival PLC (t/a Carnival UK) v Hunter (Unfair Dismissal) [2024] EAT 167 (15 August 2024)

The EAT quashed findings of automatic and ordinary unfair dismissal in a maternity-redundancy case and remitted the matter to a fresh tribunal.

  • Unfair dismissal
  • Automatic unfair dismissal
  • Redundancy
  • Maternity leave
  • Discrimination on grounds of pregnancy or maternity
  • Redundancy selection process
Read case analysis
Employment law [2024] EAT 103

Bicknell & Anor v NHS Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Integrated Commissioning Board (Transfer of Undertakings)

Bicknell & Anor v NHS Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Integrated Commissioning Board (Transfer of Undertakings) [2024] EAT 103 (25 June 2024)

The EAT held that commissioning healthcare services by a CCG was not, by itself, an economic activity under TUPE. The appeal was dismissed.

  • Transfer of undertakings (tupe)
  • Automatic unfair dismissal
  • Economic activity definition
  • Public administrative functions
  • Employee rights on transfer
  • Tupe
Read case analysis
Employment law [2024] EAT 98

Ballerino v Racecourse Association Ltd (Discrimination - direct discrimination because of sex, maternity and pregnancy - s.13 and s.18 Equality Act 2010 - Unfair Dismissal - automatically unfair dismissal - s.99 Employment Rights Act and regulation 20(1)(b) Maternity and Parental Leave etc Regulations 1999)

Ballerino v Racecourse Association Ltd (Discrimination - direct discrimination because of sex, maternity and pregnancy - s.13 and s.18 Equality Act 2010 - Unfair Dismissal - automatically unfair dismissal - s.99 Employment Rights Act and regulation 20(1)(b) Maternity and Parental Leave etc Regulations 1999) [2024] EAT 98 (20 June 2024)

The EAT allowed an appeal in a maternity-related sham redundancy case, holding the tribunal had failed to decide whether there was a genuine redundancy.

  • Direct sex discrimination
  • Pregnancy and maternity discrimination
  • Automatic unfair dismissal
  • Redundancy
  • Burden of proof
  • Suitable alternative vacancy
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

United Kingdom decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.