Sign in
United Kingdom Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

United Kingdom Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

United Kingdom decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Tax law [2026] UKFTT 657 (TC)

Sweetmotion Ltd v Revenue and Customs (VAT - Kittel - fast moving consumer goods - knew or should have known - company penalty - mitigation)

Sweetmotion Ltd v Revenue and Customs (VAT - Kittel - fast moving consumer goods - knew or should have known - company penalty - mitigation) [2026] UKFTT 657 (TC) (05 May 2026)

The tribunal upheld a Kittel-based VAT input tax denial in part and reduced a VAT company penalty, finding Sweetmotion should have known of fraud from 19 January 2021.

  • Vat fraud
  • Input tax deduction
  • Kittel principle
  • Company penalty
  • Mitigation of penalty
  • Vat-fraud
Read case analysis
Tax law [2026] UKFTT 657

Sweetmotion Ltd v Revenue and Customs (VAT - Kittel - fast moving consumer goods - knew or should have known - company penalty - mitigation)

Sweetmotion Ltd v Revenue and Customs (VAT - Kittel - fast moving consumer goods - knew or should have known - company penalty - mitigation) [2026] UKFTT 657 (TC) (05 May 2026)

The tribunal upheld a VAT input tax denial for trades linked to fraudulent suppliers, finding the appellant should have known of the fraud from 19 January 2021.

  • Vat fraud
  • Input tax deduction
  • Kittel principle
  • Company penalty
  • Mitigation of penalty
  • Vat-fraud
Read case analysis
Tax law [2026] UKFTT 175

Massala Exotic Ltd & Anor v Revenue and Customs (VAT- suppressed takings - first appellant best judgement assessment? - explanation that there were three card machines and takings from businesses run by relatives - explanation rejected - no overcharge - company penalty based on deliberate inaccuracies)

Massala Exotic Ltd & Anor v Revenue and Customs (VAT- suppressed takings - first appellant best judgement assessment? - explanation that there were three card machines and takings from businesses run by relatives - explanation rejected - no overcharge - company penalty based on deliberate inaccuracies) [2026] UKFTT 175 (TC) (29 January 2026)

The tribunal upheld a VAT best judgment assessment, a deliberate inaccuracy penalty, and a personal liability notice against a restaurant company and its sole director.

  • Vat assessment
  • Best judgment assessment
  • Company penalty
  • Personal liability notice
  • Deliberate inaccuracy
  • Burden of proof
Read case analysis
Tax law [2026] UKFTT 175 (TC)

Massala Exotic Ltd & Anor v Revenue and Customs (VAT- suppressed takings - first appellant best judgement assessment? - explanation that there were three card machines and takings from businesses run by relatives - explanation rejected - no overcharge - company penalty based on deliberate inaccuracies)

Massala Exotic Ltd & Anor v Revenue and Customs (VAT- suppressed takings - first appellant best judgement assessment? - explanation that there were three card machines and takings from businesses run by relatives - explanation rejected - no overcharge - company penalty based on deliberate inaccuracies) [2026] UKFTT 175 (TC) (29 January 2026)

The tribunal upheld HMRC’s VAT best judgment assessment, company penalty, and personal liability notice after rejecting the claim that other family businesses used separate card machines.

  • Vat assessment
  • Best judgment assessment
  • Company penalty
  • Personal liability notice
  • Deliberate inaccuracy
  • Burden of proof
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

United Kingdom decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.