Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
United Kingdom decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Hypervolt Ltd v Jackson (PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE) [2026] EAT 45 (05 March 2026)
The EAT allowed Hypervolt’s appeal, holding that the tribunal gave inadequate reasons and failed to follow the proper reconsideration process under Rule 72.
The Privy Council held that a default judgment on a non-money remedy can be appealed, and that the claimant’s action should be struck out as an abuse of process.
Chelmsford Unisex Hair Salon Ltd v Grunwell [2019] UKEAT 0135_19_2910 (29 October 2019)
The EAT dismissed an appeal against a remedy judgment, holding the ET had not erred by proceeding in the respondent's absence after proper notice.
Talash Hotels v Smith (PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Right to be heard) [2019] UKEAT 0050_19_1909 (19 September 2019)
The EAT held that the tribunal erred by excluding the respondent from remedy proceedings and by failing to provide the claimant’s computation or reasons.
Limoine v Sharma (PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE –- Appearance /response - Right to be heard) [2019] UKEAT 0094_19_0907 (9 July 2019)
The Employment Appeal Tribunal held that judgment cannot be entered simply because a claim is undefended; the judge must assess whether the claim is properly made out and consider participation rights.
Campbell v Jamie Stevens (Kensington) Ltd (PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Appearance/response) [2019] UKEAT 0097_19_0807 (08 July 2019)
The EAT held that sending the ET1 to the respondent’s trading address using its trading name could comply with Rule 15, and remitted the case.
The Privy Council dismissed an appeal against refusal of a new trial, holding the appellant had not proved he was misdirected to the wrong court or shown a viable defence.
Camden Federation Of Tenants & Residents Association v Hayward (Practice and Procedure : Application/Claim) [2014] UKEAT 0423_13_2802 (28 February 2014)
The Employment Appeal Tribunal held that discretion had been wrongly fettered when refusing a late review application against default judgment, and remitted the matter.
Pallet Route Solutions Ltd v Morris (Practice and Procedure : Appearance or Response) [2013] UKEAT 0411_12_1010 (10 October 2013)
The EAT held that a late respondent was not absolutely barred from participating in a remedy hearing and that excluding participation without considering discretion caused procedural unfairness.
Rojas v Brent Association Of Disabled People Ltd (Debarred) (Practice and Procedure : Review) [2013] UKEAT 0109_13_1709 (17 September 2013)
The EAT allowed an appeal against revocation of a default judgment, finding the Employment Judge had acted on a false factual basis and remitting the review application.
Explore more
