Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
United Kingdom decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Car Sales Solutions Ltd v Riekstins (Practice and Procedure) [2026] EAT 72 (18 May 2026)
The EAT allowed CSS’s appeal against refusal of reconsideration, holding the Employment Tribunal failed to follow the required procedure and remitting reconsideration to a different judge.
Lau v Dragon Cat Ltd t/a Dragon Cat Cafe & Ors [2026] EAT 65 (30 April 2026)
The EAT held that strict extension-of-time principles for filing appeals do not apply to late answers. It granted the respondents time to serve their answer.
Ndow v University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (Unfair dismissal; disability discrimination; time limits) [2026] EAT 64 (30 April 2026)
The Employment Appeal Tribunal dismissed an appeal against a time-bar ruling on unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claims, holding that unraised points could not found an error of law.
Chowdhury v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care [2026] EAT 69 (30 April 2026)
The EAT allowed an appeal against a Registrar’s refusal to extend time, holding the claimant’s appeal could proceed despite procedural irregularity and late filing.
QRS v London Borough of Tower Hamlets & Ors (PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - extension of time for seeking a rule 3(10) hearing) [2026] EAT 60 (22 April 2026)
The EAT refused an extension of time for a late rule 3(10) request, finding the appellant had not shown ill health caused the default and the appeal was academic.
Benson & Ors v Revenue and Customs (PAYE and National Insurance Contributions - VAT) [2026] UKFTT 565 (TC) (09 April 2026)
The tribunal refused late costs applications by Mr Benson and Really Local Group, striking out Peckham Levels’ application for lack of authority.
JR2024LON001256 [2026] UKAITUR JR2024LON001256 (18 March 2026)
The Upper Tribunal refused to admit an out-of-time judicial review, finding the applicant had fabricated evidence of posting and that his claim was unarguable.
Hypervolt Ltd v Jackson (PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE) [2026] EAT 45 (05 March 2026)
The EAT allowed Hypervolt’s appeal, holding that the tribunal gave inadequate reasons and failed to follow the proper reconsideration process under Rule 72.
Safe and Efficient Care Ltd v Care Quality Commission [2026] UKFTT 257 (HESC) (23 February 2026)
The Tribunal refused to extend time for an appeal against CQC registration cancellation, finding the application was lodged out of time and no exceptional circumstances justified relief.
Baker v Information Commissioner [2025] UKFTT 154 (GRC) (02 February 2026)
The Tribunal refused an in-person hearing, extended time for a set-aside request, and refused to set aside a 2025 strike-out or grant a stay.
Explore more
