Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
United Kingdom decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Diamante Investments Ltd v London Borough of Waltham Forest [2025] UKFTT 914 (GRC) (31 July 2025)
The Tribunal allowed a letting agent’s appeal in part, reducing a £5,000 penalty to £4,000 for failure to belong to a redress scheme.
Harfitt Property Agents v Shropshire Council [2025] UKFTT 279 (GRC) (04 March 2025)
The Tribunal dismissed a solicitor-led letting agent’s appeal against an £8,400 penalty for failing to join an approved client money protection scheme.
Mendip Property Management Ltd v Bath & North East Somerset Council [2025] UKFTT 118 (GRC) (10 February 2025)
The First-tier Tribunal dismissed Mendip Property Management Ltd’s appeal against a £10,000 penalty for failing to hold client money protection scheme membership.
LS88 Ltd v London Borough of Tower Hamlets (Re Professional Regulation) [2025] UKFTT 257 (GRC) (27 January 2025)
The tribunal dismissed LS88 Ltd’s appeal against two £2,250 financial penalties for failing to publish required letting-agent fees and a client money certificate.
Olympia Estates Ltd v Westminster City Council [2019] UKFTT PR_2019_0028 (GRC) (19 November 2019)
The tribunal dismissed Olympia Estates Ltd’s appeal and upheld a £5,000 penalty for failing to display required fees on its website under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.
Northwest 6 Ltd v London Borough of Brent [2019] UKFTT PR_2019_0029 (GRC) (16 September 2019)
The tribunal upheld a ÂŁ1,500 penalty against a letting agent for failing to display required fee, client money protection, and redress scheme information.
Chetts Estate Ltd v London Borough of Barking & Dagenham [2019] UKFTT PR_2019_0079 (GRC) (1 September 2019)
The tribunal dismissed Chetts Estates Ltd’s appeal against a £2,500 penalty for failing to publish required letting-agent information on its website.
Fraser Consultants (London) Ltd v London Borough of Tower Hamlets [2019] UKFTT PR_2018_0075 (GRC) (24 May 2019)
The tribunal allowed Fraser Consultants’ appeal in part, reducing one penalty to £3,000 for redress-scheme non-membership but upholding a £5,000 penalty for failing to publicise fees.
Ultra Estates SJW Ltd v Westminster City Council [2019] UKFTT PR_2018_0045 (GRC) (9 April 2019)
The tribunal found Ultra Estates breached duties to display client money protection information and to belong to a redress scheme, but reduced one penalty for financial hardship.
Lifestyle Club Ltd v London Borough of Islington [2019] UKFTT PR_2018_0040 (GRC) (19 February 2019)
The Tribunal dismissed Lifestyle Club Ltd’s appeal against Islington’s £5,000 penalty for failing to belong to an approved redress scheme.
Explore more
