Sign in
United Kingdom Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

United Kingdom Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

United Kingdom decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Immigration law [2026] UKAITUR UI2025003310

UI2025003310

UI2025003310 [2026] UKAITUR UI2025003310 (20 February 2026)

The Upper Tribunal dismissed an immigration appeal, holding there was no proven historical injustice from delay and no error in treating Patel as irrelevant.

  • Article 8 echr
  • Historical injustice
  • Delay in decision-making
  • Asylum
  • Private life
  • Immigration policy application
Read case analysis
Immigration [2026] UKAITUR UI2025003423

UI2025003423 & UI2025003424

UI2025003423 & UI2025003424 [2026] UKAITUR UI2025003423 (19 January 2026)

The Upper Tribunal held that the First-tier Tribunal gave inadequate reasons on risk from the father’s sur place political activity and remitted the appeals.

  • International protection
  • Sur place political activity
  • Article 8 echr
  • Risk on return
  • Adequacy of judicial reasoning
  • Delay in decision-making
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2025] UKAITUR UI2025002121

UI2025002121

UI2025002121 [2025] UKAITUR UI2025002121 (30 October 2025)

The Upper Tribunal dismissed the Secretary of State’s appeal, holding that the First-tier Tribunal made no material error of law in finding very compelling circumstances against deportation.

  • Deportation of foreign criminals
  • Article 8 echr (right to private and family life)
  • Delay in decision-making
  • Very compelling circumstances test
  • Section 117c nationality, immigration and asylum act 2002
  • Deportation-of-foreign-criminals
Read case analysis
Immigration [2025] UKAITUR UI2025000439

UI2025000439

UI2025000439 [2025] UKAITUR UI2025000439 (20 October 2025)

Upper Tribunal allowed an Article 8 appeal by a Chinese national with 25 years in the UK, finding removal disproportionate in light of age, vulnerability, and delay.

  • Article 8 echr
  • Appendix private life
  • Proportionality
  • Criminal conviction impact
  • Delay in decision-making
  • Article-8-echr
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2025] UKAITUR UI2024002843

UI2024002843

UI2024002843 [2025] UKAITUR UI2024002843 (11 August 2025)

Upper Tribunal allowed the deportee appellant’s Article 8 appeal, finding an 11-year delay in deciding revocation of a deportation order was egregious and reduced the public interest in removal.

  • Deportation of foreign criminals
  • Article 8 echr (right to private and family life)
  • Delay in decision-making
  • Revocation of deportation order
  • Very compelling circumstances under s.117c(6) nationality, immigration and asylum act 2002
  • Deportation-of-foreign-criminals
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2025] UKAITUR UI2025001424

UI2025001424

UI2025001424 [2025] UKAITUR UI2025001424 (23 July 2025)

Upper Tribunal dismissed an appeal against refusal of protection and human rights claims, finding no material error in the First-tier Tribunal’s assessment of evidence and risk.

  • Asylum
  • International protection
  • Article 8 echr
  • Credibility assessment
  • Country conditions
  • Risk on return
Read case analysis
Immigration [2025] UKAITUR UI2024005574

UI2024005574

UI2024005574 [2025] UKAITUR UI2024005574 (10 June 2025)

The Upper Tribunal found material errors of law in the First-tier Tribunal’s dismissal of a private life appeal, including flawed treatment of Bihari identity, country evidence, and delay.

  • Private life
  • Integration obstacles
  • Ethnic discrimination
  • Delay in decision-making
  • Immigration
  • Human-rights
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2025] UKAITUR UI2024005945

UI2024005945

UI2024005945 [2025] UKAITUR UI2024005945 (24 March 2025)

Upper Tribunal upheld dismissal of a Pakistani appellant’s human rights appeal, finding no material error in the First-tier Tribunal’s treatment of disability, medical evidence, delay, or proportionality.

  • Article 3 echr
  • Article 8 echr
  • Immigration control
  • Proportionality
  • Disability and removal
  • Medical evidence
Read case analysis
Immigration [2025] UKAITUR JR2023LON00185

JR2023LON00185 & JR2023LON001858

JR2023LON00185 & JR2023LON001858 [2025] UKAITUR JR2023LON00185 (20 January 2025)

The Upper Tribunal dismissed an Afghan family’s judicial review as academic after the children had joined their mother in the UK and received entry clearance.

  • Afghan citizens resettlement scheme
  • Operation pitting
  • Judicial review procedure
  • Leave outside the rules
  • Biometric requirements
  • Delay in decision-making
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2025] UKAITUR UI2024004138

UI2024004138

UI2024004138 [2025] UKAITUR UI2024004138 (14 January 2025)

Upper Tribunal dismissed an asylum and Article 8 appeal, holding that the First-tier Tribunal’s credibility findings were properly reasoned and no material error of law was shown.

  • Asylum
  • Refugee status
  • Article 8 echr
  • Credibility assessment
  • Delay in decision-making
  • Article-8-echr
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

United Kingdom decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.