Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
United Kingdom decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Privy Council held that CS Life breached its duty to invest policy assets under the chosen mandate, adjusted damages timing, and restored a misrepresentation claim.
The Privy Council held that CS Life had to invest policy assets according to the chosen discretionary mandate, but corrected the damages start dates.
Smart v Revenue and Customs (NCOME TAX - whether the appellant was liable to income tax on sums payable by overseas entities that are taxable) [2025] UKFTT 701 (TC) (12 June 2025)
The tribunal dismissed Mr Smart’s income tax appeal over BTG JCP distributions, holding he was the person receiving or entitled to the sums and rejecting rescission-based arguments.
UI2022003613 [2024] UKAITUR UI2022003613 (15 April 2024)
The Upper Tribunal dismissed the Secretary of State’s appeal and upheld deprivation of British citizenship, finding deliberate deception and no Article 8 or public law error.
UI2023004691 [2024] UKAITUR UI2023004691 (25 March 2024)
The Upper Tribunal dismissed the Secretary of State’s appeal in a citizenship deprivation case, holding that the deprivation decision was unlawful for failure to exercise discretion.
UI2023002359 [2024] UKAITUR UI2023002359 (21 February 2024)
Upper Tribunal dismissed an appeal against a deprivation of British citizenship decision, finding no material error in the First-tier Tribunal’s public law review.
IA057282022 [2023] UKAITUR IA057282022 (23 May 2023)
Upper Tribunal upheld a refusal to interfere with deprivation of citizenship, finding no material error in the First-tier Tribunal’s treatment of disclosure, delay, or article 8.
DC001452019 [2021] UKAITUR DC001452019 (28 September 2021)
The Upper Tribunal set aside a First-tier Tribunal decision allowing an appeal against deprivation of citizenship, finding the credibility reasoning materially flawed and remitting the case.
The Privy Council dismissed Dr Dass’s appeal, affirming that the claimants were tricked into conveying their property and that concurrent factual findings should stand.
OA029752013 & OA029772013 [2014] UKAITUR OA029752013 (10 December 2014)
Upper Tribunal upheld refusal of settlement to ex-Gurkha applicants, finding the appellant’s attempted false registration of his daughter’s birth date was serious adverse information.
Explore more
