Sign in
Zambia Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Zambia Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Zambia decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil procedure [2025] ZMHC 109

Thabani Walima v Sibeso Ingombe and Anor (2023/HP/1292)

Thabani Walima v Sibeso Ingombe and Anor (2023/HP/1292) [2025] ZMHC 109 (25 November 2025)

The High Court dismissed an application to stay execution of a writ of elegit, finding no arguable defence on the merits and no sufficient explanation for default.

  • Stay of execution
  • Default judgment
  • Setting aside judgment
  • Stay-of-execution
  • Default-judgment
  • Setting-aside-judgment
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2025] ZMHC 77

Gabbs Mukuwa Sichibbalo (Suing in his capcity as administrator of the esate of the late Moses Mudenda Sichibbalo) v Kelvin Kaunda (2023/HPC/0104)

Gabbs Mukuwa Sichibbalo (Suing in his capcity as administrator of the esate of the late Moses Mudenda Sichibbalo) v Kelvin Kaunda (2023/HPC/0104) [2025] ZMHC 77 (29 September 2025)

The High Court dismissed an application to set aside a judgment entered in the defendant’s absence, finding no sufficient cause for non-attendance at trial.

  • Setting aside judgment
  • Absence of party at trial
  • Sufficient cause
  • Setting-aside-judgment
  • Absence-of-party-at-trial
  • Sufficient-cause
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2025] ZMCA 117

Attorney General v Pythias Simukonda (Appeal No. 180/2023)

Attorney General v Pythias Simukonda (Appeal No. 180/2023) [2025] ZMCA 117 (20 August 2025)

The Court of Appeal set aside a default judgment against the State for non-compliance with section 22 of the State Proceedings Act and sent the matter back for trial.

  • Default judgment
  • Setting aside judgment
  • Service of process
  • State proceedings
  • Default-judgment
  • Setting-aside-judgment
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2025] ZMCA 47

Queens Cash Finance Limited v Krestah Hanongo Muchindu Kanene (Application/64/2024)

Queens Cash Finance Limited v Krestah Hanongo Muchindu Kanene (Application/64/2024) [2025] ZMCA 47 (27 February 2025)

The respondent duly filed and served his heads of argument, and their absence from the record was due to an administrative error not attributable to him. Not considering his arguments interfered with his right to be heard. In the absence of malafides or dilatory conduct, the right to be heard takes precedence, warranting the setting aside of the judgment.

  • Right to be heard
  • Setting aside judgment
  • Absence of parties
  • Court discretion
  • Service of documents
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2025] ZMCA 10

Peter Mutale v Davies Mukumbwa (Appeal No.24/2024)

Peter Mutale v Davies Mukumbwa (Appeal No.24/2024) [2025] ZMCA 10 (24 January 2025)

The affidavit sworn by the appellant in South Africa was not authenticated as required by section 3 of the Authentication of Documents Act, rendering it fundamentally defective and inadmissible as evidence. The lower court was correct in expunging the affidavit and refusing to set aside the judgment on admission. The appeal was dismissed as the only valid ground failed.

  • Authentication of documents
  • Service of process
  • Affidavit requirements
  • Setting aside judgment
  • Right to be heard
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2025] ZMCA 79

Peter Mutale v Davies Mukumbwa (Appeal No.24/2024)

Peter Mutale v Davies Mukumbwa (Appeal No.24/2024) [2025] ZMCA 79 (24 January 2025)

An affidavit executed outside Zambia and not authenticated in accordance with section 3 of the Authentication of Documents Act is fundamentally defective and cannot be used as evidence in Zambian proceedings. The lower court was correct in expunging the unauthenticated affidavit. The appeal was dismissed as the only valid ground related to the affidavit's admissibility, and the appellant's other grounds were incompetent for being argumentative and narrative.

  • Authentication of documents
  • Service of process
  • Setting aside judgment
  • Affidavit requirements
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2024] ZMHC 282

Albatross Mining Limited v Zamastone Limited and Ors (2024/HP/1527)

Albatross Mining Limited v Zamastone Limited and Ors (2024/HP/1527) [2024] ZMHC 282 (3 December 2024)

The Plaintiff failed to demonstrate good and sufficient grounds or high prospects of success in the application to set aside the Partial Consent Judgment. The existence of legal representation for the Plaintiff at the time of entering the Consent Judgment undermined the argument of lack of comprehension. Therefore, there is no justification to deny the Defendants immediate enjoyment of the judgment.

  • Stay of execution
  • Consent judgment
  • Setting aside judgment
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2024] ZMHC 280

Percy Mussa v William Tembo (2020/HP/0448)

Percy Mussa v William Tembo (2020/HP/0448) [2024] ZMHC 280 (28 November 2024)

The defendant demonstrated an arguable defense on the merits regarding the legality of the seizure of goods under a warrant of distress, which outweighs the lack of a convincing explanation for the default. Therefore, the default judgment should be set aside.

  • Default judgment
  • Setting aside judgment
  • Warrant of distress
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2024] ZMCA 281

Bwalya Lumbwe v Ronald Simwinga (DR) (Appeal No. 96 of 2024)

Bwalya Lumbwe v Ronald Simwinga (DR) (Appeal No. 96 of 2024) [2024] ZMCA 281 (31 October 2024)

The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against refusal to set aside judgment entered in the appellant’s absence, finding no sufficient cause and upholding case management discretion.

  • Setting aside judgment
  • Case management
  • Adjournments
  • Service of process
  • Stay of execution
  • Civil-procedure
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2024] ZMCA 241

Panicco Engineering Limited v Marks Industries Limited (Appeal No. 292/2022)

Panicco Engineering Limited v Marks Industries Limited (Appeal No. 292/2022) [2024] ZMCA 241 (10 September 2024)

The Court of Appeal held that a default judgment against one defendant could be set aside where the claim was intertwined with claims against other defendants and liability had to be determined together.

  • Default judgment
  • Setting aside judgment
  • Joint liability
  • Trespass
  • Damages
  • Procedural fairness
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Zambia decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.