Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Zimbabwe decisions
Decisions matching the current search
S v Dziva and Another [2024] ZWHHC 214 (28 May 2024)
The High Court convicted two accused of fraud after finding they falsely claimed influence over a judge’s sentence to obtain money. Both were acquitted on bribery.
S v Makumbirofa and Another (40 of 2024) [2024] ZWCHHC 40 (23 April 2024)
The High Court allowed a bail appeal, finding no compelling reasons to deny bail where the State had not properly substantiated absconding or interference risks.
Zimbabwe Agricultural Society v Confined Auto [Private] Limited (73 of 2024) [2024] ZWHHC 73 (16 February 2024)
The High Court held the transaction was a sale, not agency, and ordered the first defendant to refund US$87,000 after the vehicle was seized by ZIMRA.
S v Bamba (158 of 2024) [2023] ZWHHC 158 (17 July 2023)
The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal against conviction and sentence for fraud arising from a vehicle-and-stand exchange involving non-disclosure of customs and registration issues.
S v Forit Contracting (Pvt) Limited and Nhokwara (646 of 2021) [2021] ZWHHC 646 (11 October 2021)
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, holding that fraud was not proved because misrepresentation and actual prejudice were not established.
Nashchrystal Motors (Private) Limited v Total Zimbabwe (Private) Limited And 3 Others (46 of 2021) [2021] ZWMTHC 46 (12 August 2021)
The High Court granted specific performance in a double-sale dispute, cancelled the later transfer, dismissed a prescription defence, and rejected the third defendant’s counterclaim.
Tangwena and Anor v The Prosecutor General (Civil Appeal SC 322 of 2018; SC 75 of 2021) [2021] ZWSC 75 (14 June 2021)
The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal against a fraud conviction, holding that the appellants filed fraudulent company documents to strip the complainant of his shareholding and investment.
Bath Ltd v ZIMRA (HH 552 of 2020; ITC 2 of 2018) [2020] ZWHHC 552 (28 August 2020)
The court held that Bath Ltd misrepresented deductible expenses in 2009 and 2010, allowing ZIMRA to reopen prescribed assessments. The earlier reasons letter satisfied s 37A(13).
S v Musendo & Anor (CA 1358 of 2013; CRB R 43 of 2012; HH 289 of 2017) [2017] ZWHHC 289 (10 May 2017)
The High Court dismissed an appeal against conviction and sentence for fraud, holding that the appellant joined a scheme to misrepresent an agreement and facilitate asset sales.
Sekard Learning Development Solution (Pvt) Ltd. v Routhy Word Eduction Adventure & Anor (HC 2629 of 2017; HH 247 of 2017) [2017] ZWHHC 247 (19 April 2017)
The High Court granted an urgent provisional interdict restraining respondents from using the applicant’s business information or holding out association, finding passing off through a misleading Facebook page.
Explore more
