Miljöskyddslag

Ympäristöministeriön on viipymättä tiedotettava internetsivuillaan komission hyväksymistä päätelmistä.

The Ministry of the Environment must publish information about the conclusions on its website promptly after the Commission approves the decision on them.

Ympäristöministeriön on ilmoitettava verkkosivuillaan päätelmistä viipymättä komission hyväksymispäätöksen jälkeen.

The Environment Ministry must promptly publish information about the conclusions on its website after the Commission approves the decision.

After an environmental permit case starts, later-issued conclusions apply only if reasonable for the applicant; if the Commission has not approved the relevant conclusions, related pre-7 January 2011 reference-document parts are used instead, and the Environment Ministry must publish the conclusions on its website without delay after Commission approval.

After an environmental permit case begins, later-adopted conclusions apply only if that is reasonable for the applicant. If the Commission has not approved the relevant conclusions, permit review uses the corresponding parts of pre-7 January 2011 reference documents, except for compliance with emission levels. The Ministry of the Environment must publish information about conclusions on its website promptly after Commission approval.

The Ministry of the Environment must promptly publish information about the conclusions on its website after the Commission has approved the decision on them.

If the Commission has approved conclusions, the Ministry of the Environment must publish information about them on its website promptly.

Päästöraja-arvot on yleensä asetettava samalle tai lyhyemmälle ajanjaksolle ja samoilla vertailuolosuhteilla kuin päästötasot. Toiminnanharjoittajan on myös toimitettava valvontaviranomaiselle vähintään vuosittain yhteenveto päästöjen tarkkailun tuloksista ympäristöluvassa määrätyllä tavalla.

The operator must send the supervisory authority an annual summary of the monitored emissions, as specified in the environmental permit.

The operator must give the supervisory authority a yearly summary of monitoring results for the emissions concerned, unless the environmental permit sets a different way of doing it.

The operator must submit to the supervisory authority at least once a year a summary of the monitoring results for the emissions concerned, as specified in the environmental permit.

Emission limit values must normally be set for the same or a shorter period and under the same reference conditions as emission levels. The operator must also provide the supervisory authority with an annual summary of monitoring results, as specified in the environmental permit.

The operator must give the supervisory authority a yearly summary of the monitoring results for the relevant emissions, and the emission limit values must usually be set for the same or a shorter period and under the same comparison conditions as the emission levels.

Emissions limit values must generally match the emissions levels’ time period and reference conditions, but may be set differently if needed because of the nature of the emissions or monitoring. The operator must also send the supervisory authority an annual summary of the monitoring results, as specified in the environmental permit.

The operator must send the supervisory authority a summary of emissions monitoring results at least once a year, as specified in the environmental permit.

Environmental permits may set less strict emission limit values in some cases, but only if the strict limits would cause unreasonably high costs compared with environmental benefits and the permit conditions fit the site or facility. The weaker limits cannot exceed the limit values in the relevant government decree or create the effects referred to in section 49, and they must be rechecked when the permit is reviewed or changed under the cited provisions.

An environmental permit may set less stringent emission limit values if the standard limits would be unreasonably costly relative to environmental benefits, but only within stated upper limits and without undermining environmental requirements.

An environmental permit may set lower emission limit values than those otherwise required if the stricter limits would cause unreasonably high costs compared with the environmental benefits, due to the facility’s location, technical features, or local environmental conditions.

Environmental permits may set less strict emission limit values in limited cases, but only if the statutory conditions are met and the limits stay within the legal ceiling.

Lower emission limits may be set in an environmental permit if the standard limits would create unreasonably high costs compared with the environmental benefits, but only within stated legal limits.

An environmental permit may set less stringent emission limit values if the normal limits would cause unreasonable costs compared with the environmental benefit, due to the facility’s location, technical features, or local environmental conditions.

Environmental permits may allow lower emission limit values in some cases, but only within strict upper bounds and quality safeguards.

Environmental permits may set lower emission limit values than the default limits when the standard limits would cause unreasonably high costs compared with the environmental benefits, due to the facility’s location, technical features, or local environmental conditions.

The permitting authority may grant a temporary exemption, on the operator’s application, for testing and use of new technology, for up to nine months.

The permit authority may grant an operator a temporary exception from emissions levels and other best available technique requirements for testing and using new technology, for up to nine months.

Lupaviranomainen voi toiminnanharjoittajan hakemuksesta myöntää enintään yhdeksän kuukauden tilapäisen poikkeuksen uuden tekniikan testausta ja käyttöä varten päästötasoista ja muista parhaan käyttökelpoisen tekniikan vaatimuksista.

Lupaviranomainen voi toiminnanharjoittajan hakemuksesta hyväksyä enintään yhdeksän kuukauden tilapäisen poikkeuksen päästötasoista ja muista parhaan käyttökelpoisen tekniikan vaatimuksista uuden tekniikan testausta ja käyttöä varten.

The permit authority may grant a temporary exemption from emission-level and other best-available-technique requirements for testing and use of new technology, for up to nine months, on the operator’s application.

The permit authority may grant a temporary exception from emissions levels and other best available technique requirements for testing and using new technology, for up to nine months, on the operator’s application.

The permit authority may grant a temporary exception from emissions levels and other best-available-technique requirements, on the operator’s application, for testing and using new technology, for up to nine months.

Permit authority may grant a temporary exception to emission levels and other best available technique requirements for testing and use of new technology, for up to 9 months.

The operator must submit a reasoned statement to the supervisory authority about whether the permit needs review within six months after the Commission publishes the relevant conclusions. If review is needed, the supervisory authority may require the operator to file a permit review application.

Toiminnanharjoittajan on toimitettava valvontaviranomaiselle selvitys luvan tarkistamisen tarpeesta, ja jos viranomainen määrää, toiminnanharjoittajan on haettava lupamuutosta määräajassa.

After the Commission publishes relevant conclusions, the operator must send the supervisory authority a reasoned explanation about whether the environmental permit needs revision.

The operator must submit a reasoned report to the supervisory authority about whether the permit needs review, and the authority may then require a permit-review application.

Environmental permit review must be started when the Commission publishes relevant conclusions and the permit does not match them or includes a lower emission limit rule.

After the Commission publishes conclusions, the environmental permit must be reviewed in certain cases, and the operator must report whether a review is needed within six months.

The operator must submit a reasoned report to the supervisory authority on whether the permit needs revision, and the authority must assess the need for revision and may then require a revision application.

Kun komissio julkaisee asiaa koskevat päätelmät, toiminnanharjoittajan on ilmoitettava valvontaviranomaiselle, tarvitaanko ympäristöluvan tarkistusta. Jos tarkistus on tarpeen, valvontaviranomainen määrää hakemuksen jättämisestä lupaviranomaiselle.

The permit authority reviews a permit on the operator’s application and may impose lighter emission limits or extra time for introducing best available techniques.

The permit authority reviews a permit on the operator’s application and may require compliance with lighter emission limits, extra time to adopt best available techniques, and later compliance with BAT conclusions.

The permit authority may review a permit on the operator’s application, set milder emission limit values if needed, allow extra time for introducing best available techniques in some cases, and the Government Decree may set more detailed review deadlines and requirements.

The permit authority may review a permit on the operator’s application and may order lighter emission limit values or extra time for installing the best available technique. The review must be handled urgently.

The permit authority reviews a permit on the operator’s request, may set stricter emission limits or extra time for adopting best available techniques, and must treat the review as urgent.

The permit authority reviews a permit on the operator’s application and may impose less strict emission limits or extra time for adopting best available techniques.

The permit authority reviews the permit on the operator’s application and may impose lighter emission limit values, extra time for adopting best available techniques, or require compliance with certain conclusions.

Lupaviranomainen voi tarkistaa luvan hakemuksesta ja määrätä lievemmistä päästöraja-arvoista; asia on ratkaistava kiireellisenä.

If a permit operator uses, stores, produces, or otherwise generates significant hazardous substances in an industrial installation, it must prepare a baseline report on soil and groundwater and attach it to the permit application.

If an operator uses, stores, produces, or otherwise generates significant hazardous substances covered by section 66, it must prepare a soil and groundwater baseline report and attach it to the permit application.

If a plant uses, stores, produces, or otherwise generates significant hazardous substances, the operator must prepare a baseline soil and groundwater report and attach it to the permit application.

If a directive facility uses, stores, produces, or otherwise generates significant hazardous substances, the operator must prepare a baseline soil and groundwater survey and attach it to the permit application.

If certain significant hazardous substances are used, stored, produced, or otherwise generated at an industrial installation, the operator must prepare a baseline report on soil and groundwater and attach it to the permit application.

If a direct-facility operator uses, stores, produces, or otherwise generates significant hazardous substances, it must prepare a soil and groundwater baseline report and attach it to the permit application.

If an operator uses, stores, produces, or otherwise generates significant hazardous substances, it must prepare a baseline soil and groundwater report and attach it to the permit application.

If a facility uses, stores, produces, or otherwise generates certain significant hazardous substances, the operator must prepare a baseline report on soil and groundwater and attach it to the permit application.

Ympäristölupapäätöksessä on vastattava lausunnoissa, muistutuksissa ja mielipiteissä esitettyihin yksilöityihin vaatimuksiin ja kerrottava, miten tietyt arvioinnit ja suunnitelmat on otettu huomioon.

Environmental permit decisions must address specified objections, explain how environmental assessment and water/flood management plans were considered when applicable, and identify each operator’s obligations in joint applications.

Environmental permit decisions must address specified claims and explain how listed assessments and plans were taken into account.

A permit decision must answer specific claims in statements and objections, explain how any required environmental impact assessment was considered, explain how water, marine, and flood-risk plans were considered, and identify each operator’s obligations when several operators apply together.

A permit decision must address specified claims and state how required assessments and management plans were taken into account; if several operators applied together, each operator’s duties must be identified.

Ympäristölupapäätöksessä on käsiteltävä lausuntoihin, muistutuksiin ja mielipiteisiin tehdyt yksilöidyt vaatimukset sekä otettava huomioon tietyt arvioinnit ja suunnitelmat.

The permit decision must address specified demands and explain how relevant assessments and plans were taken into account; in joint permit applications, each operator’s obligations must be identified.

A permit decision must address the specified demands raised in statements, objections, and opinions, explain how environmental impact assessment and relevant water, marine, and flood-risk plans were taken into account, identify each operator’s duties in a joint application, and may be further detailed by Government Decree.

The authority that made the decision must announce it on its notice board before the decision date, keep the notice up during the appeal period, and make the decision available on the date stated.

The decision-making authority must announce a permit decision before its issue date, publish required notice details, keep the notice posted for the appeal period, and make the decision available on the stated issue date.

Päätöksestä on ilmoitettava etukäteen viranomaisen ilmoitustaululla, ilmoitus on pidettävä nähtävillä valitusajan ajan ja päätöksen on oltava saatavilla ilmoitettuna antamispäivänä.

Lupaviranomaisen on annettava lupapäätös tiedoksi julkisella kuulutuksella ja julkaistava siihen liittyvät tiedot verkkosivuilla sekä muissa ilmoituskanavissa.

Lupaviranomaisen on annettava lupapäätös tiedoksi julkisella kuulutuksella, ja kuulutuksessa sekä päätöksessä on noudatettava tässä pykälässä kuvattuja tiedoksianto- ja julkaisusääntöjä.

The permit authority must give notice of permit decisions by public announcement, include the appeal period, keep the notice and decision visible during the appeal period, and remove published personal data from the website after the activity ends and closure steps are completed.

The permit authority must publicly notify permit decisions and keep the notice and decision available for the appeal period. Certain personal data published on websites must be removed after the licensed activity ends and closure measures are completed.

The permit authority must notify the permit decision by public notice, include the appeal period, keep the notice and decision visible for the appeal period, and remove published personal data after the activity ends and closure measures are completed.

Permit decisions must be sent to specified recipients and published locally and online in certain cases.

Certain permit decisions must be published on the authority’s website; municipal environmental protection authorities do this if possible.

Lupapäätös on toimitettava ja ilmoitettava useille tahoille, ja päätöksestä on julkaistava tieto sekä kunnassa että tietyissä tapauksissa lehdessä ja viranomaisen verkkosivuilla.

Anyone may request electronic information about environmental permit decisions in a given area, if the authority’s system can handle the request and send automated messages.

Anyone may request electronic information about environmental permit decisions for a specified area, if the authority’s system can receive the request and send messages automatically.

Kuka tahansa voi pyytää saada tiedon tietyllä alueella annetuista ympäristölupapäätöksistä sähköisesti, jos viranomaisen järjestelmä pystyy käsittelemään pyynnön ja lähettämään viestit automaattisesti.

Anyone may request electronic notice of environmental permit decisions for a specified area, if the authority’s system can receive such requests and send messages automatically.

Anyone may request electronic notice of environmental permit decisions in a specified area, if the authority’s information system can process the request and send messages automatically.

Anyone may request electronic information about environmental permit decisions issued in a specified area, if the authority’s information system can receive the request and send messages automatically.

Anyone has a right, on request, to receive information about environmental permit decisions for a specified area by electronic message, if the authority’s system can handle the request and send messages automatically.

Anyone may request electronic information about environmental permit decisions for a specified area, if the authority’s system can receive the request and send messages automatically.

An environmental permit decision is generally valid until further notice, but it can be set for a fixed term in certain cases. A fixed-term permit expires when the term ends unless the decision says otherwise.

Environmental permit decisions are generally valid indefinitely, but a fixed term can be set in certain cases, and a fixed-term permit lapses when the term ends unless the decision says otherwise.

An environmental permit decision is generally valid indefinitely, but it may be set for a fixed term on the applicant’s request or for a weighty reason. A fixed-term permit expires when the term ends unless the decision says otherwise.

Environmental permit decisions are generally valid indefinitely, but they can be set for a fixed term in certain cases.

An environmental permit decision is generally valid indefinitely, but it may be set for a fixed term if requested by the operator or for weighty reasons; a fixed-term permit expires when the term ends unless the permit decision says otherwise.

An environmental permit decision is generally valid indefinitely, but it may be set for a fixed term in certain cases.

An environmental permit decision is generally valid until further notice, but it may be set for a fixed term in certain cases. A fixed-term permit expires when the term ends unless the permit decision says otherwise.

An environmental permit decision is generally valid indefinitely, but it may be set for a fixed term on the operator’s request or for a weighty reason.

Lupaviranomainen voi päättää, että lupa raukeaa, jos toiminta on ollut keskeytyneenä vähintään viisi vuotta tai muita listed conditions are met.

Lupaviranomainen voi päättää, että lupa raukeaa tietyissä tilanteissa, kuten pitkän keskeytyksen, toiminnan aloittamatta jättämisen tai tarkistushakemuksen puuttumisen vuoksi.

The licensing authority may let a permit lapse if operations have been interrupted for at least five years, if the operator says the activity will not start or has ended, if required start-up steps were not taken within five years (or a longer deadline in the permit), or if a permit review request was not filed as required.

The permit authority may let a permit lapse if operations have been interrupted for at least five years, if the holder says operations will not start or have ended, if required start-up steps were not begun within five years (or a longer period set in the permit decision), or if a permit review application was not made as required.

Lupaviranomainen voi päättää, että lupa raukeaa, jos toiminta on ollut keskeytyneenä vähintään viisi vuotta, toimintaa ei ole aloitettu määräajassa, tai luvan tarkistamista koskevaa hakemusta ei ole tehty.

Lupaviranomainen voi päättää, että lupa raukeaa tietyissä viivästys- tai keskeytystilanteissa.

Lupaviranomainen voi päättää, että lupa raukeaa tietyissä viivästys-, keskeytys- tai tarkistushakemuksen laiminlyöntitilanteissa.

The permit authority may let a permit lapse if the activity has been interrupted for at least five years, the operator says it will not start or has ended, the activity is not started within five years (or a longer period set in the permit decision), or no application for review is made as required.

Toiminnanharjoittaja may apply to amend an environmental permit. If certain conditions are met, the permit authority must amend the permit. The authority must also hear the operator before deciding and may request specific additional information.

Toiminnanharjoittaja may apply to change an environmental permit, and the permitting authority must change a permit in listed cases when the request comes from certain authorities or affected parties.

Toiminnanharjoittaja may request an environmental permit amendment, and the permit authority must amend a permit in specified situations.

The permit holder may apply to change an environmental permit, and the permit authority must change a permit in certain listed situations.

Toiminnanharjoittaja voi hakea ympäristöluvan muuttamista, ja lupaviranomaisen on tietyissä tilanteissa muutettava lupaa tai lupamääräyksiä.

Toiminnanharjoittaja voi hakea ympäristöluvan muuttamista, ja lupaviranomaisen on tietyissä tilanteissa muutettava lupaa sekä kuultava toiminnanharjoittajaa ja tarvittaessa pyydettävä selvityksiä.

An operator may apply to change an environmental permit, and the permit authority must change the permit in certain cases. For some initiated cases, the authority must also hear the operator and may request needed explanations.

Toiminnanharjoittaja may apply to change an environmental permit, and the permit authority must change the permit if listed conditions are met. If the change starts from a third party’s initiative, the authority must hear the operator and may ask for needed explanations.

Lupaviranomainen voi täsmentää lupamääräystä tai täydentää lupaa erityisen selvityksen perusteella.

The permit authority may clarify a permit condition or supplement a permit based on special information obtained under section 54.

Lupaviranomainen voi muuttaa lupaa tai lupamääräystä erityisen selvityksen perusteella.

The permit authority may уточify a permit condition or supplement a permit based on special information obtained under section 54.

Lupaviranomainen voi muuttaa lupaa tai lupamääräystä erityisen selvityksen perusteella.

The permitting authority may clarify a permit condition or add to a permit based on a special investigation obtained under section 54.

The licensing authority may clarify a permit condition or add to a permit based on special information obtained under section 54.

The permit authority may clarify a permit condition or add to a permit based on special information obtained under section 54.

The permit authority may extend a deadline for complying with an environmental permit condition, but only on application, up to three years, and not where the extension would conflict with this Act, the Waste Act, related regulations, or Finland’s binding international obligations.

The permit authority may extend a deadline by up to three years on application if the permit holder would face significant difficulties for reasons beyond their control and postponement would not create a significant risk of environmental pollution.

The permit authority may extend an environmental permit compliance deadline by up to three years on application if the permit holder faces major difficulties beyond their control and the delay would not risk significant environmental pollution.

The permit authority may extend a deadline by up to three years on application if complying on time would cause the permit holder significant difficulty for reasons beyond their control and the delay would not risk significant environmental pollution.

Lupaviranomainen voi hakemuksesta pidentää ympäristöluvan määräaikaa enintään kolmella vuodella, jos edellytykset täyttyvät, mutta ei saa tehdä sitä lainvastaisesti.

The permit authority may extend a deadline by up to three years on application if compliance causes the permit holder serious difficulties beyond the holder’s control and delayed compliance would not risk significant environmental pollution.

The permit authority may extend a compliance deadline by up to three years on application if the permit holder faces serious difficulties for reasons beyond their control and the delay does not risk significant environmental pollution.

Lupaviranomainen voi hakemuksesta pidentää ympäristöluvan määräaikaa enintään kolmella vuodella, jos luvanhaltijalla on siitä riippumattomista syistä huomattavia vaikeuksia eikä viivästys aiheuta merkittävää ympäristön pilaantumisen vaaraa.

The permitting authority may update environmental permit information by issuing a written statement, if requested by the operator or the supervisory authority and if the statement only clarifies the permit without changing its substance in a way that could cause pollution, risk of pollution, or affect anyone’s rights or interests.

The permit authority may, on request, issue a written statement to update environmental permit information if it is only clarifying and does not change the permit’s real content in a way that could cause pollution, risk of pollution, or affect anyone’s rights or interests.

Lupaviranomainen may update environmental permit information by giving a written statement, if requested by the operator or the supervisory authority and if the statement is only clarifying.

The permitting authority may, at the request of the operator or supervisory authority, issue a written statement to update environmental permit information if the statement is only clarifying and does not change the permit’s actual content in a way that could cause pollution, risk, or affect anyone’s rights or interests.

The permit authority may update environmental permit information by issuing a written statement, if requested by the operator or supervisory authority and if the statement only clarifies the permit without changing its actual content in a way that could cause pollution, risk of pollution, or affect anyone’s rights or interests.

The permit authority may, on request, issue a written statement that updates environmental permit information, if the statement is only clarifying and does not change the permit’s actual content in a way that could cause environmental pollution, risk of pollution, or affect anyone’s rights or interests.

The permit authority may, on request, issue a written statement to update environmental permit information, but only if it is clarifying and does not change the permit’s real content in a way that could cause pollution risk or affect anyone’s rights or interests.

Lupaviranomainen voi pyynnöstä antaa kirjallisen lausuman ja päivittää ympäristöluvan tiedot, jos muutos on vain selventävä eikä muuta luvan tosiasiallista sisältöä haitallisella tavalla.

The permit authority may revoke a permit on the initiative of the supervisory authority if any listed condition is met.

Lupaviranomainen voi peruuttaa luvan valvontaviranomaisen aloitteesta, jos tietyt virheet tai rikkomukset täyttyvät.

The permit authority may revoke a permit on the initiative of the supervisory authority if certain misstatements, repeated violations, or changed conditions are present.

The permit authority may revoke a permit on the supervisory authority’s initiative if false information was given, permit terms were repeatedly violated after a written warning, or the activity can’t continue by changing the permit.

The licensing authority may revoke a permit on the supervisory authority’s initiative if certain problems are shown.

The permit authority may revoke a permit on the initiative of the supervisory authority if the applicant gave false information, permit terms were repeatedly breached after a written warning, or the activity cannot continue by changing the permit.

Lupaviranomainen voi peruuttaa luvan valvontaviranomaisen aloitteesta tietyissä tilanteissa.

The licensing authority may revoke a permit on the initiative of the supervisory authority if certain listed conditions are met.

When a licensed or registrable activity ends, the former operator remains responsible for pollution-prevention measures and for investigating and monitoring impacts. If the operator no longer exists or cannot be reached, the site holder must do the monitoring. If a permit lacks enough closure provisions, the permit authority must issue them.

After a permitted or registered activity ends, the former operator must still take needed pollution-prevention, investigation, and monitoring measures; if the operator cannot be reached and monitoring is needed, the site holder is responsible; and the permit authority must issue closure orders if the permit is too vague.

After a licensed or registrable activity ends, the operator still has to take required pollution-prevention, investigation, and monitoring measures; if the operator is gone or unreachable, the site holder must monitor when needed; and the permit authority must add closure provisions if the permit lacks them.

After certain licensed or registrable activities end, the operator remains responsible for pollution-prevention measures, impact investigation, and monitoring.

Kun luvanvarainen tai rekisteröitävä toiminta päättyy, toiminnanharjoittaja vastaa edelleen pilaantumisen ehkäisemisestä sekä vaikutusten selvittämisestä ja tarkkailusta.

When a licensed or registered activity ends, the operator still has to take required steps to prevent pollution and to investigate and monitor impacts.

After a permitted or registered activity ends, the operator remains responsible for pollution-prevention measures, impact investigation, and monitoring; if the operator cannot be found, the site holder must monitor when needed, and the permit authority must issue missing closure conditions.

When an environmentally permitted or registered activity ends, the operator remains responsible for required pollution-prevention measures, impact investigation, and monitoring. If the operator no longer exists or cannot be reached, the site holder must monitor environmental effects when that monitoring is needed. If the environmental permit lacks sufficient closure provisions, the permitting authority must issue them.

Kun direktiivilaitos suljetaan, toiminnanharjoittajan on arvioitava maaperän ja pohjaveden tila, toimitettava arvio viranomaiselle ja tarvittaessa selvitettävä ja puhdistettava pilaantunut alue.

Kun direktiivilaitoksen toiminta päättyy, toiminnanharjoittajan on arvioitava maaperän ja pohjaveden tila ja toimitettava arvio viranomaiselle; viranomainen voi määrätä palauttamistoimet ja julkaisee tiedon toteutetuista toimista.

If a baseline report exists, the operator must assess soil and groundwater condition when operations end and submit the assessment to the relevant authority.

When a direct-installation activity ends, the operator must assess soil and groundwater against the baseline and submit the assessment to the authority.

When a directive plant closes, the operator must assess soil and groundwater against the baseline, include needed restoration measures, and submit the assessment to the competent authority.

When a direct-activity facility ends, the operator must assess soil and groundwater against the baseline and submit the assessment to the competent authority.

When an installation ends, the operator must assess soil and groundwater against the baseline and submit the assessment to the competent authority.

When the activity ends, the operator must assess soil and groundwater against the baseline report, include needed restoration measures, and submit the assessment to the competent authority.

If this Act says this section applies, the matter must be handled under the listed provisions on supplementing an application, requesting statements, hearing parties, serving and notifying the application and decision, and related decision-content rules. In certain small or limited matters, notice and notification may be simplified or unnecessary.

Jos tässä laissa viitataan tähän pykälään, asian käsittelyssä on noudatettava useita menettelysäännöksiä, kuten hakemuksen täydentämistä, lausuntojen pyytämistä, kuulemista, tiedoksiantoa, päätöksen sisältöä ja päätöksestä ilmoittamista koskevia säännöksiä.

If this section is applied, the case must be handled under several listed provisions on supplementing an application, requesting statements, hearing parties, notifying the application and decision, and issuing and sending the decision.

This section says that, when it is applied, case handling must follow specified provisions on supplementing an application, requesting statements, hearing parties, notifying applications and decisions, and contents of decisions.

This section says that, when it applies, the case must follow the listed rules on supplementing an application, requesting statements, hearing parties, notifying the application and decision, and decision content.

Tässä pykälässä määrätään, miten asiaa käsiteltäessä sovelletaan tiettyjä menettelysäännöksiä, kuten hakemuksen täydentämistä, lausuntojen pyytämistä, kuulemista, tiedottamista ja päätöksen antamista/julkaisemista.

If this section applies, the matter must be handled under the listed procedural rules, including supplementation, opinions, hearing, notice, decision content, delivery, and publication, with some notice exceptions for minor matters or matters affecting only the applicant.

If this section is applied to a case, the handling must follow the rules on supplementing an application, requesting opinions, hearing parties, notifying about the application, and issuing, sending, and publishing the decision, with some exceptions for minor matters or cases affecting only the applicant.

Sections 98–106 apply to large combustion plants using solid, liquid, or gaseous fuel with at least 50 MW fuel input, but several listed facility types are excluded.

Large combustion plants using solid, liquid, or gaseous fuel and with a fuel input of at least 50 MW are subject to sections 98–106, except for the listed plant and equipment types.

Sections 98–106 apply to large combustion plants using solid, liquid, or gaseous fuel with a fuel input of at least 50 MW, but several listed facility types are excluded.

Sections 98–106 apply to large combustion plants using solid, liquid, or gaseous fuel with a fuel power of at least 50 megawatts, except for the listed excluded installations and equipment.

Section 97 says the next sections apply to large combustion plants burning solid, liquid, or gaseous fuel with at least 50 MW fuel input, but lists several excluded facility types.

Sections 98–106 apply to large combustion plants using solid, liquid, or gaseous fuel with at least 50 MW fuel input, but several listed facility types are excluded.

Large combustion plants using solid, liquid, or gaseous fuel and with at least 50 MW fuel input are subject to sections 98–106, with listed exclusions.

Rules in sections 98–106 apply to combustion plants using solid, liquid, or gaseous fuel with a fuel input power of at least 50 MW, except for listed excluded facility types.

Several separate boiler, gas turbine, or engine units count as one combustion plant if their flue gases go through a common chimney, and their fuel capacities are added together.

Some combustion units must be counted together as one combustion plant when their flue gases go through a common stack; units under 15 MW are excluded from the calculation.

Certain boilers, gas turbines, or engines sharing a common chimney are treated as one combustion plant, and their fuel powers are added together; units below 15 MW are excluded from that calculation.

When calculating a combustion plant’s fuel capacity, separate units may have to be counted together if they share a chimney; units under 15 MW are excluded, and there is an exception for certain units in use by 31 December 1994 under different operators.

When multiple listed units share a common flue stack, they are treated as one combustion plant and their fuel powers are added together; units below 15 MW are excluded.

When multiple separate energy units exhaust through a shared stack, they are treated as one combustion plant and their fuel input is added together; units below 15 MW are excluded.

Certain boilers, gas turbines, or internal combustion engines are treated as one combustion plant if their flue gases go through a common chimney, and their fuel powers are added together; units under 15 MW are not counted.

Certain boiler, gas turbine, or internal combustion units are counted together as one combustion plant for fuel-power calculation, with units under 15 MW excluded from the calculation.

A large combustion plant operator must immediately report fuel supply disruptions and flue-gas cleaning equipment disruptions or breakdowns to the state supervisory authority and the municipal environmental protection authority.

Large combustion plant operators must immediately notify the state supervisory authority and municipal environmental authority of fuel supply disruptions and scrubber equipment disruptions or breakdowns, and must use low-emission fuels or restrict plant operations during scrubber failures.

Large combustion plant operators must promptly report fuel-supply disruptions and flue-gas cleaning equipment disruptions/breakdowns to the state supervisory authority and the municipal environmental protection authority.

Large combustion plant operators must promptly report fuel supply disruptions and flue-gas cleaning equipment failures, and must use low-emission fuels or limit plant operation during such equipment disruptions.

A large combustion plant operator must immediately report fuel-supply disruptions and flue-gas cleaning device failures to the state supervisory authority and the municipal environmental authority, and during such a failure must use low-emission fuels or limit plant operations.

Large combustion plant operators must immediately report fuel supply disruptions and flue-gas cleaning device disruptions or breakdowns to the state supervisory authority and the municipal environmental protection authority.

A large combustion plant operator must immediately report fuel-supply disruptions and flue-gas cleaning equipment disruptions or breakdowns to the state supervisory authority and the municipal environmental authority, and must use low-emission fuels or restrict plant operations during equipment malfunction or breakdown.

Suuren polttolaitoksen toiminnanharjoittajan on ilmoitettava tietyistä häiriöistä viipymättä ja noudatettava toiminnan rajoittamista tai vähäpäästöisten polttoaineiden käyttöä häiriön aikana.

Certain combustion plants of at least 300 MW must include a carbon-capture feasibility report in the environmental permit application, and if capture appears feasible the permit must reserve space on the plant site for capture and compression equipment.

Vähintään 300 MW:n polttolaitoksen ympäristölupahakemukseen on liitettävä selvitys hiilidioksidin talteenoton edellytyksistä, ja jos edellytykset näyttävät olevan olemassa, luvassa on varattava sopiva tila talteenotto- ja paineistuslaitteistolle.

Large combustion plants must include a carbon-capture feasibility report with their environmental permit application, and the report must cover storage sites, transfer equipment, and retrofitting feasibility. If capture seems feasible, the permit must reserve space on the site for capture and compression equipment. The rule does not apply to plants already permitted before 27 June 2009.

Large combustion plants (300 MW or more) must include a carbon-capture conditions report with their environmental permit application.

Large combustion plants (300 MW or more) must attach a CO2 capture conditions report to the environmental permit application, and the permit must reserve suitable space for capture/compression equipment if capture appears feasible.

Large combustion plants with at least 300 MW nominal electrical output must attach a carbon capture feasibility report to their environmental permit application, and if capture appears feasible, the permit must reserve space on site for capture and compression equipment.

A combustion plant of at least 300 MW must attach a report on the conditions for carbon capture to its environmental permit application, and if carbon-capture conditions appear to exist, the permit must require reserving suitable space for capture and compression equipment.

A combustion plant with at least 300 MW nominal electric output must include a report on carbon capture conditions in its environmental permit application, and if capture appears feasible, the permit must reserve suitable space on site for capture and compression equipment.

Valtioneuvosto may decide on a national transition plan for reducing emissions from large combustion plants, and operators/facilities must meet the plan’s emission-reduction and permit-compliance requirements.

The Government may decide on a national transition plan to cut emissions from large combustion plants, on application by operators.

Valtioneuvosto may decide on a national transition plan for large combustion plants if operators apply, and the plan sets a common emissions-reduction duty and related limits.

The Government may decide on a national transition plan for cutting emissions from large combustion plants if operators apply, and it must set detailed allocation, annual maximum emissions, and related information in the decision.

The Government may approve an operator-requested national transition plan for large combustion plant emissions and must set detailed emission-reduction requirements and annual pollutant limits.