Sign in
Australia Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Australia Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Australia decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative law

Kaempfe v University of New South Wales

The Tribunal set aside a summons issued to UNSW’s Vice-Chancellor, finding the requests lacked a legitimate forensic purpose and were oppressive.

  • Summons
  • Legitimate forensic purpose
  • Oppressive process
  • Relevance
  • Set aside summons
  • Legitimate-forensic-purpose
Read case analysis
Anti-discrimination law

Hardin v Warrumbungle Shire Council

Leave to proceed was refused in a disability discrimination and victimisation complaint against Warrumbungle Shire Council.

  • Disability discrimination
  • Victimisation
  • Goods and services
  • Leave to proceed
  • Complaint lacking in substance
  • Disability-discrimination
Read case analysis
Human rights

Bozkurt v Department of Communities and Justice (Homes NSW)

The Tribunal refused leave for Ms Bozkurt’s discrimination complaint to proceed, finding the material did not support an inference of race, age or disability discrimination.

  • Leave to proceed
  • Complaint lacking in substance
  • Direct discrimination
  • Indirect discrimination
  • Accommodation discrimination
  • Age discrimination
Read case analysis
Administrative law

Faraj v Hanson

The Tribunal determined the jurisdiction issue on the papers and dismissed the proceedings, holding that hearing the complaint would involve impermissible federal jurisdiction.

  • Jurisdiction
  • Federal diversity jurisdiction
  • Religious vilification
  • Dispensing with hearing
  • Summary dismissal
  • Federal-diversity-jurisdiction
Read case analysis
Anti-discrimination law

Quilty v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force

Quilty v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2025] NSWCATAD 56

The Tribunal dismissed a sex discrimination complaint against NSW Police, finding no evidentiary basis for differential treatment or causation.

  • Sex discrimination
  • Provision of services
  • Differential treatment
  • Causation
  • Sex-discrimination
  • Provision-of-services
Read case analysis
Anti-discrimination law

Connor v Australian Financial Complaints Authority Ltd

Connor v Australian Financial Complaints Authority Ltd [2025] NSWCATAD 46

The Tribunal dismissed Mr Connor’s disability discrimination complaint against AFCA, finding no adequate evidence of disability, causation, or discriminatory treatment.

  • Disability discrimination
  • Goods and services
  • Complaint resolution scheme
  • Mental health condition
  • Disability-discrimination
  • Goods-and-services
Read case analysis
Administrative law

FSO v Secretary, Department of Education (No 2)

The Appeal Panel dismissed the respondent’s costs application, finding no special circumstances to depart from the usual rule that each party bears their own costs.

  • Special circumstances for costs
  • Self-represented appellant
  • Appeal dismissed/no extension of time
  • Section 60 ncat act
  • Tribunal-costs
  • Special-circumstances-costs
Read case analysis
Administrative law

Karnauchow v State of NSW, NSW Department of Communities and Justice (Corrective Services)

Karnauchow v State of NSW, NSW Department of Communities and Justice (Corrective Services) [2025] NSWCATAP 24

The Appeal Panel dispensed with a hearing on a prisoner's miscellaneous application and made procedural directions about further evidence on computer access and related issues.

  • Procedural fairness
  • Access to justice for prisoners
  • Disability discrimination
  • Victimisation
  • Tribunal powers and practice
  • Access-to-justice
Read case analysis
Anti-discrimination law

El Kassir v Woolworths Group Limited

El Kassir v Woolworths Group Limited [2025] NSWCATAD 14

The Tribunal refused leave for a disability discrimination complaint against Woolworths to proceed, finding the claim lacked substance and was unlikely to succeed.

  • Disability discrimination
  • Provision of goods and services
  • Leave to proceed after complaint declined
  • Unfettered discretion to grant leave
  • Unjustifiable hardship
  • Duty of care to staff
Read case analysis
Anti-discrimination law

GXH v University of New England

GXH v University of New England [2025] NSWCATAD 10

The Tribunal refused leave for a race discrimination and victimisation complaint against the University of New England to proceed, finding the claims lacked substance.

  • Race discrimination
  • Employment law
  • Victimisation
  • Leave to proceed (tribunal)
  • Promotion and workplace entitlements
  • Race-discrimination
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Australia decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.