Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Australia decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Ultra Tune Australia Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2025] FCAFC 1
The Full Court dismissed Ultra Tune's appeal against $1.5 million contempt fines, holding the missing warning endorsement did not bar punishment and the penalties were not excessive.
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2022] FCA 1251
The Federal Court found ANZ made misleading representations about its systems for administering Breakfree and offset benefits, and imposed a $25 million penalty.
Kosen-Rufu Pty Ltd v Dixon Advisory and Superannuation Services Ltd [2022] FCA 573
The Federal Court stayed one of two overlapping class actions, finding the no win, no fee model was more likely to benefit group members than litigation funding.
Application by Flexigroup Limited (No 2) [2020] ACompT 2
The Tribunal varied an ACCC authorisation for the NET Code, allowing it only with conditions that removed anti-competitive BNPL and standard-setting provisions.
Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria v Gibson (No 4) [2018] FCA 1868
The Federal Court allowed a post-judgment application to vary entered orders by adding a penal notice, despite delay and expiry of the compliance period.
Flogineering Pty Ltd v Blu Logistics SA Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 1607
The Federal Court made declarations and injunctions against milk transport respondents for using an approval number without authority, breaching the ACL.
Bradshaw v Complete Coating Commercial Pty Ltd t/as CCC Civil [2017] NSWCATAP 209
The Appeal Panel held the Tribunal erred in valuing a quantum meruit claim by focusing on contract price, allowed the appeal, and remitted quantification.
Guy v Crown Melbourne Limited [2017] FCA 1104
The Court ruled that much of Dr Livingstone’s affidavit was admissible as direct evidence, but his opinion evidence was excluded for non-compliance with expert evidence rules.
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Metricon Homes Qld Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 797
The Federal Court found Metricon Homes Qld Pty Ltd made misleading advertising claims about prices, inclusions and build-time guarantees, and imposed agreed penalties and injunctions.
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Channel Seven Brisbane Pty Limited [2009] HCA 19
The High Court held that Channel Seven’s broadcasts were not protected by the s 65A media exemption and affirmed liability for misleading or deceptive conduct.
Explore more
