Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Australia decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court found negligence in sheet piling works that damaged the Rayman home, rejected a non-delegable duty argument, and awarded damages plus interest.
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Money3 Loans Pty Ltd (Expert Evidence Admissibility) [2025] FCA 75
The Federal Court rejected Money3’s challenge to ASIC’s expert report, holding the report sufficiently disclosed its factual basis and specialised knowledge.
Parkin v Boral Limited (Materiality Evidence Ruling) [2025] FCA 70
The Federal Court declined to exclude expert materiality evidence in a continuous disclosure class action, finding any prejudice could be managed and the issue went to weight.
Boral Limited v Parkin [2024] FCAFC 169
Full Court allowed Boral’s appeal against an evidentiary ruling permitting cross-examination about privileged EY communications in ongoing investor class actions.
R v Askarou [2024] NSWDC 552
The District Court refused the Crown’s bid to admit prior evidence of an overseas witness, finding the Crown had not taken all reasonable steps to secure attendance.
Mastercard Asia/Pacific Pte Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2024] FCA 1237
The Federal Court dismissed Mastercard’s application for leave to appeal against an interlocutory decision taking judicial notice of RBA statistical information under s 85A.
R v Bates [2024] NSWDC 612
The District Court held that disputed electronic communications could be tendered by the defence even though the complainant denied authorship, with jury directions to follow.
R v Farrell [2024] NSWDC 547
DNA evidence was excluded after the court found serious non-compliance with forensic procedure safeguards, including informed consent and interview-friend requirements.
The High Court considered whether a judge gave adequate reasons when refusing disclosure of informer-related documents on public interest immunity grounds under s 130 of the Evidence Act 2008 (Vic).
Sharpe v TechnologyOne Limited [2024] FCA 962
The Federal Court dismissed a strike-out application, finding it was not plain the claimant’s reliance on a letter and enclosure was wholly barred by without prejudice privilege.
Explore more
