Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Australia decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Liu v Lam [2024] NSWSC 1306
The NSW Supreme Court found a binding agreement between Liu and Lam, rejected a partnership defence, and held the contractual default interest was unenforceable as a penalty.
Warner Capital Pty Ltd v Shazbot Pty Ltd [2024] NSWCA 245
Appeal dismissed in a partnership accounting dispute over valuing insolvency work in progress and residual goodwill in an insolvency practice.
Nanevski Developments Pty Ltd v Slaveski; Mega-Top Cargo Pty Ltd v Nanevski Developments Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 1066
The Court found a partnership existed for the purchase and development of two Sans Souci properties, ordered winding up and accounting, and dismissed related conversion, trespass, debt and misleading conduct claims.
The High Court held that a surviving partner’s declaration of trust over partnership land did not create new interests and was not a dutiable transaction.
Wilson v Britten-Jones [2019] FCA 747
The Federal Court refused an interlocutory injunction sought to stop a partnership meeting considering expulsion of a partner, finding no prima facie case of sex discrimination or victimisation.
Doak v GJ & BP Chard [2015] NSWSC 431
The NSW Supreme Court refused to dismiss, strike out, or stay a cross-claim arising from a partnership-related personal injury dispute, finding triable issues remained.
Sze Tu v Lowe [2014] NSWCA 462
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeals in a family partnership dispute, set aside most trust and accounting orders, and held the partnership dissolved in 1989.
The Court awarded pre-judgment interest in a partnership accounts dispute, applying s 100 of the Civil Procedure Act, and ordered costs partly on the indemnity basis.
Taylor v Saloniklis [2013] FCA 679
The Federal Court ordered standard discovery in a civil proceeding, finding the pleadings detailed and that discovery should occur immediately rather than wait for evidence.
In the matter of Australia Seiwa Pty Limited and In the matter of Seiwa Australia Pty Limited [2012] NSWSC 1334
The Supreme Court of NSW dismissed applications to set aside statutory demands, holding the demands were validly signed and served with authority.
Explore more
