Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Australia decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Appeal Panel dismissed Farah Ahmed’s appeal and refused leave, upholding the Tribunal’s refusal of a refund, most damages claims, and CAD/copyright relief.
The Appeal Panel held J Hadley was denied procedural fairness in her damages claim and allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal’s orders and remitting the matter.
The Appeal Panel refused recusal applications by both members, finding the appellant had not proven actual bias from prior decisions, costs orders, or missing reasons.
The Appeal Panel allowed amendment of the notice of appeal but dismissed an appeal about an adjournment refusal, finding no denial of procedural fairness.
YJB v YJC [2024] NSWCATAP 221
Appeal Panel dismissed an appeal from guardianship and financial management orders, refusing leave to appeal and vacating an earlier order.
FTK18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1152
The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review challenge to a refused extension of time, holding that delayed written reasons did not create procedural unfairness.
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Ly [2018] FCAFC 123
The Full Court dismissed an appeal over a visa refusal, holding the Tribunal had to give the applicant a chance to answer concerns that hotel receipts were not genuine.
The High Court allowed a Nauruan migration appeal, finding denial of procedural fairness when the Supreme Court failed to consider a notice of motion and relied on unsigned material.
Jackson v N K Tiling Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCATAP 106
The Appeal Panel allowed an internal appeal, finding procedural fairness was denied when unrepresented appellants were not offered an adjournment to rely on late evidence.
Smeaton v Valerius [2015] NSWCATAP 223
The Appeal Panel allowed an appeal on costs, holding the Tribunal denied procedural fairness by deciding costs without inviting submissions and by giving inadequate reasons.
Explore more
