Sign in
Australia Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Australia Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Australia decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Intellectual property

Cytec Industries Inc. v Nalco Company (No 4)

Cytec Industries Inc. v Nalco Company (No 4) [2024] FCA 1318

The Federal Court refused Nalco’s further patent amendment application, holding the amended claims still lacked support and clear, complete disclosure.

  • Patent amendment
  • Patent claim construction
  • Opposition proceedings
  • Judicial discretion on amendment
  • Patent-amendment
  • Patent-claim-construction
Read case analysis
Intellectual property

SARB Management Group Pty Ltd T/A Database Consultants Australia v Vehicle Monitoring Systems Pty Limited

SARB Management Group Pty Ltd T/A Database Consultants Australia v Vehicle Monitoring Systems Pty Limited [2024] FCAFC 6

Full Court appeal in a patent dispute about parking overstay detection. Claims 21 and 32 were construed not to cover systems where the data collection apparatus determines overstay.

  • Patent infringement
  • Claim construction
  • Best method requirement
  • Patent-claim-construction
  • Best-method-requirement
  • Patent-infringement
Read case analysis
Intellectual property

Allied Pumps Pty Ltd v LAA Industries Pty Ltd

Allied Pumps Pty Ltd v LAA Industries Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 1457

Federal Court patent case on an innovation patent for a dewatering pump control system. The Court construed the claims, found novelty failure, and dismissed the infringement cross-claim.

  • Innovation patent
  • Claim construction
  • Novelty/anticipation
  • Infringement
  • Patent priority date
  • Secret use
Read case analysis
Intellectual property

Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents

Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents [2022] HCA 29

The High Court held that Aristocrat’s EGM claim was not patentable subject matter because it was a mere game scheme implemented on conventional computer technology.

  • Patentable subject matter
  • Manner of manufacture
  • Computer-implemented inventions
  • Innovation patent requirements
  • Patentable-subject-matter
  • Manner-of-manufacture
Read case analysis
Intellectual property

Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd v Generic Partners Pty Ltd (No 4)

Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd v Generic Partners Pty Ltd (No 4) [2020] FCA 1776

The Court partly allowed an amendment to a patent pleadings claim for additional damages, limiting it to alleged benefits said to have accrued from the respondents’ alleged infringement.

  • Infringement proceedings
  • Relief (damages)
  • Additional damages under patents act s 122(1a)
  • Amendment of pleadings
  • Patent-infringement
  • Additional-damages
Read case analysis
Intellectual property

Calidad Pty Ltd v Seiko Epson CorporationCitation:[2020] HCA 41Before:Kiefel CJ, Bell, Gageler, Keane, Nettle, Gordon, Edelman JJDate:12 Nov 2020Case Number:S329/2019Read more

The High Court considered whether modifying used printer ink cartridges for resale infringed patent rights, and whether patent exhaustion or implied licence doctrines should apply.

  • Patent infringement
  • Exhaustion doctrine
  • Implied licence doctrine
  • Modification of patented products
  • Patent-infringement
  • Patent-exhaustion
Read case analysis
Intellectual property

Merial, Inc. v Intervet International B.V. (No 4)

Merial, Inc. v Intervet International B.V. (No 4) [2017] FCA 223

The Federal Court allowed Merial’s patent opposition appeal, set aside the Commissioner’s decision, upheld the opposition, and ordered the application not proceed to grant.

  • Patent entitlement
  • Inventive step
  • Patent opposition
  • Amendments to patent applications
  • Costs orders
  • Patent-opposition
Read case analysis
Intellectual property

Apotex Pty Ltd v Warner-Lambert Company LLC (No 2)

Apotex Pty Ltd v Warner-Lambert Company LLC (No 2) [2016] FCA 1238

Federal Court patent judgment on pregabalin pain-treatment claims, addressing construction, sufficiency, utility, false suggestion, and Swiss-style infringement.

  • Patent validity
  • Patent infringement
  • Patent construction
  • Utility (usefulness)
  • Sufficiency of disclosure
  • Entitlement
Read case analysis
Intellectual property

NSL Engineering Pte Ltd v Australian Mobile Mining Equipment Systems and Accessories Pty Limited (No 2)

NSL Engineering Pte Ltd v Australian Mobile Mining Equipment Systems and Accessories Pty Limited (No 2) [2016] FCA 1187

The Federal Court vacated earlier orders, dismissed the remaining application, and allocated costs after a patents dispute and abandoned damages claim.

  • Patent infringement
  • Unjustified threats
  • Damages quantification
  • Costs
  • Patent-infringement
  • Unjustified-threats
Read case analysis
Intellectual property

Voxson Pty Limited v Telstra Corporation Limited (No 4)

Voxson Pty Limited v Telstra Corporation Limited (No 4) [2016] FCA 915

The Federal Court granted leave to amend Voxson’s patent pleadings, but required removal of references to control-channel transmission and ordered costs on the amendment.

  • Application for leave to amend pleadings
  • Patent infringement
  • Construction of patent claims
  • Patent-infringement
  • Amendment-of-pleadings
  • Claim-construction
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Australia decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.