Canada Judgment

Federal Court

McLean v. Canada (Attorney General)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Court exercised its supervisory authority under the Settlement Agreement and the prior Order of Fee Approval to approve payment of $612,414.23 (inclusive of HST) for post-Implementation legal services for the period October 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 and authorized withdrawal of that amount from funds held in trust pursuant to Sections 13.02–13.04 of the Settlement Agreement and the Order of Fee Approval dated August 19, 2019.

Court disposition

Approved payment of $612,414.23 (inclusive of HST) for post-Implementation legal services for the period October 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 and authorized withdrawal from trust funds.

Orders

  • The fees and disbursements, inclusive of HST, for post-Implementation legal services provided by Class Counsel between October 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020, is hereby approved in the amount of $612,414.23.
  • The above amount may be withdrawn from the funds held in trust as settled pursuant to Sections 13.02 to 13.04 of the Settlement Agreement and the Order of Fee Approval, dated August 19, 2019.

02

Material facts

Parties

Garry Leslie McLean

Plaintiff

Roger Augustine

Plaintiff

Claudette Commanda

Plaintiff

Angela Elizabeth Simone Sampson

Plaintiff

Margaret Anne Swan

Plaintiff

Mariette Lucille Buckshot

Plaintiff

Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada as represented by the Attorney General of Canada

Defendant

Amounts and remedies

  • Approved Fee Pool: CAD 7,000,000
  • Approved Payment This Period: CAD 612,414.23

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Class Proceeding / Fee Approval (post Implementation)

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The Plaintiffs (Class Counsel) moved for approval of fees and disbursements, inclusive of HST, in the amount of $612,414.23 for post-Implementation legal services rendered from October 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 and requested authorization to withdraw that amount from trust funds pursuant to Sections 13.02–13.04 of the Settlement Agreement and the Court's Order of Fee Approval dated August 19, 2019.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Settlement Agreement; Order of Fee Approval (August 19, 2019); Federal Court jurisdiction over class proceedings

    Court approval is required for transfers from settlement trust for class counsel fees where the settlement and prior court orders require periodic approval.

  2. 02

    Order of Fee Approval (August 19, 2019); Settlement Agreement

    Fees and disbursements, including applicable taxes, may be approved in accordance with the terms of the settlement and supervising court orders.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Court exercised its supervisory authority under the Settlement Agreement and the prior Order of Fee Approval to approve payment of $612,414.23 (inclusive of HST) for post-Implementation legal services for the period October 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 and authorized withdrawal of that amount from funds held in trust pursuant to Sections 13.02–13.04 of the Settlement Agreement and the Order of Fee Approval dated August 19, 2019.

Court disposition

Approved payment of $612,414.23 (inclusive of HST) for post-Implementation legal services for the period October 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 and authorized withdrawal from trust funds.

  • The fees and disbursements, inclusive of HST, for post-Implementation legal services provided by Class Counsel between October 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020, is hereby approved in the amount of $612,414.23.
  • The above amount may be withdrawn from the funds held in trust as settled pursuant to Sections 13.02 to 13.04 of the Settlement Agreement and the Order of Fee Approval, dated August 19, 2019.

Source and reliance status

Federal Court · 24 August 2021

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Federal Court

Judgment· 24 August 2021

2021 FC 868

McLean v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2021-08-24 Neutral citation 2021 FC 868 File numbers T-2169-16 Decision Content Date: 20210824 Docket: T-2169-16 Citation: 2021 FC 868 Ottawa, Ontario, August 24, 2021 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Phelan

CLASS PROCEEDING BETWEEN: GARRY LESLIE MCLEAN, ROGER AUGUSTINE, CLAUDETTE COMMANDA, ANGELA ELIZABETH SIMONE SAMPSON,

MARGARET ANNE SWAN AND

MARIETTE LUCILLE BUCKSHOT Plaintiffs and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA as represented by THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Defendant

ORDER WHEREAS this Court issued the Orders of Settlement Approval and Fee Approval on August 19, 2019, and in doing so, approved $7,000,000 be payable in trust for post-Implementation legal services provided by Class Counsel to Survivor Class Members; WHEREAS the Order of Fee Approval, dated August 19, 2019, directs Class Counsel to seek this Court’s approval on a quarterly basis to transfer a specified amount of money from trust to pay Class Counsel’s fees, disbursements and applicable taxes; AND UPON the Plaintiffs bringing the within motion in writing to approve payment of the legal fees, disbursements, and taxes for legal services performed by Class Counsel between October 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020; THIS COURT ORDERS that: The fees and disbursements, inclusive of HST, for post-Implementation legal services provided by Class Counsel between October 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020, is hereby approved in the amount of $612,414.23; and The above amount may be withdrawn from the funds held in trust as settled pursuant to Sections 13.02 to 13.04 of the Settlement Agreement and the Order of Fee Approval, dated August 19, 2019. blank “Michael L. Phelan” blank Judge

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.