Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Federal Court dismissed the MPCC’s judicial review applications, holding OPS conduct-complaint investigations are not policing duties or functions and disclosure was not compelled for the public interest investigation.
The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review of a CRA staffing recourse decision, finding the Individual Feedback process fair and the ineligibility ruling reasonable.
The Federal Court found CRA benefit ineligibility decisions unreasonable and procedurally unfair, then quashed them and remitted the matter for redetermination.
The appeal was moot because the specific dispute (prorogation of the 44th Parliament) had been extinguished by dissolution and a new Parliament, but the Court exercised its discretion to hear the appeal on the merits because an adversarial context remained, the issues are of significant public importance and evasive of review, and adjudication falls within the proper judicial function.
Source excerpt
The Federal Court granted judicial review on procedural fairness grounds, remitting a CERB/CRB eligibility decision for redetermination by a different decision maker.
The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review of a CBSA grievance decision, finding the decision reasonably addressed bias, fairness, and disclosure concerns.
The Federal Court dismissed Antonio Utano’s judicial review of a CBSA grievance decision, finding the process reasonably addressed bias, fairness, and disclosure concerns.
The Federal Court struck a mandamus application seeking disclosure of First Nation records, finding no pleaded public duty and no legal basis that could be cured by amendment.
The court set aside the RBC and BDC third party notices under Rule 3-5(8) because they failed to plead facts establishing any entitlement to contribution/indemnity or other connection to the narrow debt claims and would massively and prejudicially expand straightforward debt litigation into broad public law and Charter inquiries; the MacIntyre NOCC was struck under Rule 9-5(1)(a) against AGC and the Province because, assuming pleaded facts true, it was plain and obvious the claims had no reasonable prospect of success given lack of pleaded proximity/duty, statutory immunity (PHA s.92), failur…
Source excerpt
The Federal Court dismissed Bradley Hart’s judicial review of an RCMP grievance timeliness ruling, holding the Appeal Adjudicator’s decision was reasonable under Vavilov.
Explore more
