Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil procedure 2026 NSSC 158

Linders v. Ordinelli

Because the parties had agreed the quantum of damages was $125,000, the court treated that as the 'amount involved' under Tariff A, applied Scale 2 ($12,250) plus $2,000 per trial day ($4,000) for a pre-multiplier total of $16,250, and increased the tariff by 50% under Rule 10.09 because the defendants' formal offer dated July 15, 2024 was made after setting down but before the Finish Date, yielding an award of $23,125; $750 in reasonable disbursements were also awarded; the plaintiff's hardship claim was rejected for lack of evidence and the defendants' formal offers qualified under Rule 10.…

  • Party and party costs
  • Formal offer to settle (rule 10)
  • Tariff of costs (tariff a)
  • Severance of liability and damages
  • Impecuniosity and relief from costs
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2025 BCSC 1689

Stoeff v. Stephenson

Costs decision after summary trial: the defendants obtained regular and double costs for specified periods, but the court refused special costs against the plaintiff.

  • Rule 9-1 offers to settle
  • Double costs
  • Special costs
  • Walk‑away/waiver offers
  • Summary trial
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Contract law 2025 BCSC 1385

423408 Alberta Ltd. v. Cooney Mansions Limited Partnership

La Cour rejette la prétention de M. Yue à une entente de règlement exécutoire de décembre 2024, jugeant que le libellé d’une clause de type « BC Ferries » n’était pas assez certain.

  • Guaranty
  • Covenant not to sue
  • Bc ferries-style settlement
  • Condition precedent to settlement
  • Interpretation of agreements
  • Summary trial
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2024 BCSC 2198

Ibrahim v. Allibhai

The court held that a July 7, 2021 settlement offer should reasonably have been accepted and ordered double costs from that date onward.

  • Offer to settle
  • Double costs
  • Rule 9-1
  • Abuse of process
  • Certificate of pending litigation
  • Misappropriation of rent
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2024 BCSC 1464

Pan v. Dong

Post-trial costs decision awarding Jing Cai costs and double costs under Rule 9-1 from January 8, 2024, after a $50,000 formal offer was rejected.

  • Formal offer to settle
  • Double costs
  • Rule 9-1
  • Eve-of-trial offers
  • All-or-nothing claims
  • Formal-offer-to-settle
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2024 BCSC 1430

Reaume v. Rossetto

On a costs application, the court awarded the plaintiff double costs from the date of her formal settlement offer, finding the defendants unreasonably rejected it.

  • Offer to settle
  • Double costs
  • Rule 9‑1(4)‑(6)
  • Future loss of earning capacity
  • Double-costs
  • Offer-to-settle
Read case analysis
Defamation 2024 BCSC 222

Schilperoort v. Huang

The court dismissed a summary trial application to enforce an alleged settlement in a defamation case, finding no binding agreement on essential terms.

  • Settlement agreement
  • Authority of counsel
  • Acceptance and counter-offer
  • Undertakings
  • Striking pleadings
  • Summary trial procedure
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2023 BCSC 1058

Miller v. Cox

Costs decision in a personal injury action: the court applied fast-track costs rules, denied double costs on a settlement offer, and reserved costs for discontinued parties.

  • Offer to settle
  • Double costs
  • Rule 15-1
  • Rule 14-1(1)(f)
  • Liability for costs of discontinued parties
  • Double-costs
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2023 BCSC 656

Funk v. McLurg

The court refused double costs under Rule 9-1 and awarded the plaintiff costs at Scale B, finding later settlement offers revoked earlier ones.

  • Offer to settle
  • Double costs
  • Cost awards
  • Rule 9-1(6)
  • Settlement strategy
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2023 BCSC 420

Ridley Terminals Inc. v. Sandvik Canada Inc.

The court dismissed leave to add a settling defendant as a third party for declaratory relief, finding the balance of prejudice favored respecting the settlement.

  • Third party proceedings
  • Bc ferry / pierringer style settlement
  • Declaratory relief
  • Disclosure and production
  • Leave to file
  • Apportionment of liability
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.