Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Source-linked decisions currently available to browse

Criminal law 2026 ONCA 346

R. v. M.T.

On sentence appeal in a sexual interference case, the Court upheld the 17-month custodial term but varied an overbroad s. 161(1) order.

  • Sentencing principles
  • Restraint for youthful offenders
  • Gladue factors
  • Geographic and non-contact orders
  • Appellate review of sentence
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis
Contract law 2026 FCA 97

Tatiana Gorenstein v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

Appeal dismissed because the Federal Court lacked statutory jurisdiction under the Federal Courts Act to adjudicate this essentially private contractual dispute between the appellant and Meta; the parties conceded the lack of federal jurisdiction and the Federal Court's reasoning on enforceability of forum selection clauses was not endorsed because necessary findings under Douez and Dell were not made.

  • Forum selection clause
  • Terms of service
  • Choice of law
  • Contract of adhesion
  • Jurisdictional competence
  • Enforceability of online arbitration/choice clauses
Read case analysis
Torts

Ahluwalia v. Ahluwalia

The Supreme Court of Canada recognized a new tort of intimate partner violence, holding that coercive control in a marital relationship can create a distinct civil wrong.

  • Intimate partner violence
  • Recognition of a novel tort
  • Coercive control
  • Assault
  • Battery
  • Intentional infliction of emotional distress
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2026 ONCA 350

R. v. Stewart

The Ontario Court of Appeal granted leave but dismissed Jamel Stewart’s sentence appeal, upholding a 30-month sentence for firearms offences.

  • Unauthorized possession of a non-restricted firearm (s.92(1) cc)
  • Failure to comply with release order (s.145(5)(a) cc)
  • Downes credit for bail conditions
  • Morris jurisprudence on anti-black systemic racism in sentencing
  • Appellate intervention in sentencing
  • Nexus requirement between background and offending
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2026 FC 633

Seydanoglu v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a CRA decision denying CRBA benefits, finding the officer reasonably concluded the applicant failed to prove eligible income and a COVID-19-related income reduction.

  • Eligibility criteria
  • Reasonableness review
  • Self-employment income
  • Income verification
  • Canada recovery benefits act
  • Judicial-review
Read case analysis
Constitutional law 2026 FC 632

Best v. Racicot

The Federal Court dismissed Casey Best’s late motion to extend time and reopen a strike order, finding no sufficient basis to revisit the pleadings.

  • Charter s7 and s15 claims
  • Motion to strike (strike pleadings)
  • Extension of time under federal court rules
  • Reconsideration (rule 397)
  • Variance (rule 399)
  • Appeal of discretionary orders (rule 51)
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2026 ONCA 345

R. v. Nygard

The Court of Appeal for Ontario upheld Peter Nygard’s convictions and 11-year sentence, finding the expert-evidence error harmless, similar-fact use proper, and fresh sentencing evidence unhelpful.

  • Expert evidence (neurobiology of trauma)
  • Similar fact evidence (cross-count use)
  • Curative proviso s.686(1)(b)(iii)
  • Fresh evidence on sentencing
  • Publication ban
  • Criminal-evidence
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2026 ONCA 347

Sheridan Retail Inc. v. Roy

The Ontario Court of Appeal upheld dismissal of Sheridan Retail’s action under Ontario’s anti-SLAPP law, but reduced the motion costs award from $156,394.54 to $75,000.

  • Anti-slapp motions
  • S.137.1 courts of justice act
  • Merits-based hurdle
  • Public interest weighing
  • Damages under s.137.1(9)
  • Full indemnity costs
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2026 ONCA 357

R. v. K.F.

The Ontario Court of Appeal admitted fresh evidence, allowed the appeal, quashed the conviction, and ordered a new trial in French.

  • Right to be tried in french
  • Section 530(3) compliance
  • Fresh evidence admissibility
  • Curative proviso (s.686(1)(b)(iv))
  • Remedy: quash conviction and order new trial
  • French-language-trial-right
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2026 FC 629

Mathur v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Federal Court found the CERB review decision unreasonable because its reasons were largely unintelligible and did not show a coherent line of analysis.

  • Reasonableness review
  • Cerb eligibility
  • Adequacy of reasons
  • Remittal
  • Reasonableness-review
  • Cerb-eligibility
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.