Canada Judgment

Supreme Court of British Columbia

R. v. Fitzgerald

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court accepted the joint submissions as the recommended terms fell within the appropriate sentencing range and the offenders' circumstances warranted the agreed custodial terms; imposed the agreed sentences and ancillary orders (lifetime s.109 firearms prohibition, DNA orders), recommended service at Pacific Institution and granted the requested stay on specified counts.

Court disposition

Sentences imposed and ancillary orders made as per joint submission and stays directed where requested

Orders

  • James Lyle Fitzgerald sentenced to 3 years imprisonment and ordered to provide a DNA sample.
  • Ryan Gregory Milliard sentenced to 2 years plus one day imprisonment; ordered to provide a DNA sample; lifetime firearms prohibition under s.109 Criminal Code; recommended to serve at the Pacific Institution.
  • David Stephen Pickup-Henriksen sentenced to 2 years plus one day imprisonment; ordered to provide a DNA sample if not already provided; lifetime firearms prohibition under s.109 Criminal Code; recommended to serve at the Pacific Institution.
  • Stay of proceedings on Count 1 against David Stephen Pickup-Henriksen.
  • Crown to serve notice regarding forfeiture on behalf of Mr. Hairan and to notify the court when done.

02

Material facts

Parties

Regina

Crown Counsel: M. Loda

James Lyle Fitzgerald

Accused Counsel: S. Wright

Ryan Gregory Milliard

Accused Counsel: E. Doricic

David Stephen Pickup-Henriksen

Accused Counsel: W. Jessop

Amounts and remedies

  • Fitzgerald Sentence (years): 3
  • Milliard Sentence (years, Including One Extra Day): 2.003
  • Pickup Henriksen Sentence (years, Including One Extra Day): 2.003

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Sentencing / Oral Reasons for Sentence

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Crown and defence made a joint submission recommending specific custodial terms: Fitzgerald 3 years; Milliard 2 years plus one day; Pickup-Henriksen 2 years plus one day; ancillary orders including lifetime firearms prohibition under s.109 and DNA sample; recommendation to serve at Pacific Institution; notice of forfeiture and stay on certain counts.
Respondent
Defence urged acceptance of the joint submission emphasizing youth, letters of support, rehabilitation prospects and that the proposed sentences fall within the appropriate range; counsel acknowledged the court's discretion to accept or reject the joint submission.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Legal principle 1

    Court has discretion to accept or reject a joint submission on sentence

  2. 02

    Criminal Code s.109

    Convicted persons are subject to firearms prohibitions under section 109 of the Criminal Code

  3. 03

    Criminal Code (DNA provisions)

    Court may order provision of a DNA sample pursuant to Criminal Code authority

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court accepted the joint submissions as the recommended terms fell within the appropriate sentencing range and the offenders' circumstances warranted the agreed custodial terms; imposed the agreed sentences and ancillary orders (lifetime s.109 firearms prohibition, DNA orders), recommended service at Pacific Institution and granted the requested stay on specified counts.

Obiter and limits

  • Judicial admonition to young offenders to pursue lawful conduct and the benefits of rehabilitation
  • Comment that Pickup-Henriksen was 'lucky' to be caught prior to law changes in 2008 which could have increased exposure
  • Observations about the value of letters of support and rehabilitation prospects

Court disposition

Sentences imposed and ancillary orders made as per joint submission and stays directed where requested

  • James Lyle Fitzgerald sentenced to 3 years imprisonment and ordered to provide a DNA sample.
  • Ryan Gregory Milliard sentenced to 2 years plus one day imprisonment; ordered to provide a DNA sample; lifetime firearms prohibition under s.109 Criminal Code; recommended to serve at the Pacific Institution.
  • David Stephen Pickup-Henriksen sentenced to 2 years plus one day imprisonment; ordered to provide a DNA sample if not already provided; lifetime firearms prohibition under s.109 Criminal Code; recommended to serve at the Pacific Institution.
  • Stay of proceedings on Count 1 against David Stephen Pickup-Henriksen.
  • Crown to serve notice regarding forfeiture on behalf of Mr. Hairan and to notify the court when done.

Source and reliance status

Supreme Court of British Columbia · 28 November 2013

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Supreme Court of British Columbia

Judgment· 28 November 2013

2013 BCSC 2343

2013 BCSC 2343 R. v. Fitzgerald

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: R. v. Fitzgerald, 2013 BCSC 2343 Date: 20131128 Docket: X073857-2 Registry: New Westminster Regina v. James Lyle Fitzgerald Ryan Gregory Milliard David Stephen Pickup-Henriksen Before: The Honourable Mr. Justice Truscott Oral Reasons for Sentence Counsel for the Crown: M. Loda Counsel for the Accused Fitzgerald: Counsel for the Accused Milliard: Counsel for the Accused Pickup-Henriksen: S. Wright E. Doricic W. Jessop Place and Date of Hearing: New Westminster, B.C. November 28, 2013 Place and Date of Judgment: New Westminster, B.C. November 28, 2013 [1] THE COURT: Mr. Milliard, I am prepared to accept the submission that has been made jointly for you. You have been told by your counsel, I am sure, that I have no obligation to accept a joint submission that is made. If I consider that it is not appropriate, I can reject it and I can deal with it differently as I see fit, but it has been explained to me fully. The cases indicate that your offence falls within the range of three years and I am satisfied that is an appropriate sentence to impose. [2] MR. DORICIC: I'm sorry, My Lord. With regard to Mr. Milliard it was two years plus a day. [3] THE COURT: Two years and one day was recommended and I will accept that, so I sentence you sir to imprisonment time of two years plus one day. I will make the recommendation that you serve

that at the Pacific Institution. [4] MR. DORICIC: Thank you, My Lord. [5] THE COURT: And in addition, there will be ancillary orders that you will have a lifetime prohibition of firearms under s. 109 of the Criminal Code and you will be ordered to give a DNA sample under the Criminal Code. [6] That completes that, thank you. [7] MR. DORICIC: Thank you, My Lord. [SENTENCE SUBMISSIONS RE ACCUSED FITZGERALD] [8] THE COURT: You are quite young, Mr. Fitzgerald, and you have a long way to go. I know how interesting it looks to young people to drive fast cars and have a lot of money at an early age, but this is what it gets you when they catch up to you. There is no better way to run your life than on the straight and narrow and you will enjoy your life a lot better that way. [9] I am prepared to accept the joint submission that has been made for you Mr. Fitzgerald, and I sentence you to three years of imprisonment. I order you to provide another DNA sample. [10] That concludes that. Thank you. [SENTENCE SUBMISSIONS RE ACCUSED PICKUP-HENRIKSEN] [11] THE COURT: You are an interesting person. You have quite a number of supporters. I have read every one of their letters. There was a particularly wonderful statement about you made by your girlfriend. I do not know if she is still your girlfriend or not, but you look like you have fallen in and out of the drug trade. [12] You are lucky in

one sense that you were caught with this weapon prior to the law changing later in 2008 or you would be on a three-year sentence. On the Indictment there is no allegation against you about peddling drugs at all, but this was a loaded prohibited weapon that you were carrying over to Mr. Hairan and we can all guess what that was for. [13] You have a chance once you get out to correct your life, and with all the support you have, you have every chance of being fully rehabilitated and to lead a wonderful life but -- and this might have been said to you on your prior conviction -- it is up to you. You have got to decide what you want to do with your entire life. You are still a very young man and this is the penalty that you pay. [14] I am prepared to accept the joint submission. I sentence you to federal time of two years plus one day of imprisonment. You will have a lifetime weapons' prohibition under s. 109 of the Criminal Code and you will provide another DNA sample if you have provided one already. [15] I will make the same recommendation for you. I appreciate security concerns as once you are in the drug trade you are at risk even in the penitentiary. So I will make the recommendation that you serve your time at the Pacific Institution. [16] That completes my sentence. [17] MR. WRIGHT: Thank you, My Lord. [18] MR. DORICIC: Thank you, My Lord. [19] MR. JESSOP: Thank you, My

Lord. [20] MS. LODA: Thank you, My Lord. With respect to forfeiture I will serve notice on Mr. Jette on behalf of Mr. Hairan and then when I have heard from him forward a copy to Your Lordship's chambers if that's okay. [21] THE COURT: Yes, that would be fine. [22] MS. LODA: All right. If a stay of proceedings could be directed against whatever counts remain outstanding. Thank you. [23] THE COURT: Yeah, the other - well, there is nobody else. [24] MS. LODA: Mr. Pickup-Henriksen was charged on Count 1 and the Crown directs a stay of proceedings with respect to that. I think that Mr. Hairan's counts have probably been (indiscernible) and nothing else should remain. [25] THE COURT: Mr. Hairan is on all the other counts only and I will stay the Count 1 against Mr. Pickup-Henriksen. "The Honourable Mr. Justice Truscott"

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Criminal Code s.109

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Criminal Code (DNA provisions)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.