Canada Judgment

Supreme Court of British Columbia

R .v. Wilson

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court accepted the joint sentencing submission and imposed the mandatory minimum one year sentence on Count 3 to be served as time already in custody (with Summers credit), imposed an 18‑month probation order with specified conditions, ordered a life prohibition under s.109 on possession of firearms and related items, ordered forfeiture and destruction of the seized pellet gun, and made a DNA order under s.487.051; Count 2 was sentenced to 30 days concurrent to time served (no additional custodial time).

Court disposition

Accused convicted on Count 2 (common assault) and Count 3 (use of a firearm or imitation in commission of an offence); sentence imposed consistent with joint submission and mandatory minimums.

Orders

  • Count 3: One year imprisonment, time served (credit applied)
  • Count 2: 30 days custody concurrent to time served (no additional custody)
  • Eighteen months probation with conditions: keep the peace and be of good behaviour; appear when required; notify court/probation officer of any change of name, address or employment; report in person to probation office within 24 hours of release and thereafter as directed; provide residential address and phone number to probation officer and not change without written notice
  • No contact (direct or indirect) with victim Soo Hyun Won
  • Not to attend Queensway Court Motel at 1616 Queensway Street, Prince George, or be within 100 metres of that location
  • Not possess any weapon as defined in s.2 of the Criminal Code
  • Not possess any knife outside residence except for immediate preparation/eating of food or employment-related purposes
  • Pursuant to s.109 Criminal Code: prohibited for life from possessing any firearm, crossbow, restricted weapon, prohibited weapon, prohibited device, ammunition, prohibited ammunition or explosive substance
  • Forfeiture and destruction of the Crosman .357 pellet gun seized by police
  • DNA order under s.487.051 authorizing taking of bodily samples for National DNA Databank registration (Form 5.03)

02

Material facts

Parties

Regina

Crown Counsel: T. Bauman

Brent Lane Wilson

Accused Counsel: F. Fatt

Soo Hyun Won

Victim

Amounts and remedies

  • Custody Length Months: 12
  • Pre Trial Custody Months: 8
  • Probation Length Months: 18
  • Count2 Days: 30

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Sentencing (oral Reasons for Sentence)

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Crown supported the joint submission of one year time served on Count 3, requested DNA order and treated s.85 as attracting the mandatory minimum; sought enforcement of protective and weapons-related conditions.
Respondent
Defence urged acceptance of the joint submission, mitigation based on the accused's horrific childhood, his completion of rehabilitation programs in custody, and entitlement to pre-trial custody credit (leading to time served).

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Criminal Code (s.85)

    Mandatory minimum one year imprisonment applies to use of a firearm or imitation while committing an offence under s.85 Criminal Code.

  2. 02

    R. v. Summers (case law referenced in judgment)

    Pre-trial custody credit may be enhanced under R. v. Summers to account for harsh remand conditions and other factors.

  3. 03

    Criminal Code (s.109)

    Court may make an order under s.109 Criminal Code prohibiting possession of firearms and related items for life where appropriate.

  4. 04

    Criminal Code (s.487.051)

    Court may order samples for DNA analysis and registration in the National DNA Databank pursuant to s.487.051 and Form 5.03.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court accepted the joint sentencing submission and imposed the mandatory minimum one year sentence on Count 3 to be served as time already in custody (with Summers credit), imposed an 18‑month probation order with specified conditions, ordered a life prohibition under s.109 on possession of firearms and related items, ordered forfeiture and destruction of the seized pellet gun, and made a DNA order under s.487.051; Count 2 was sentenced to 30 days concurrent to time served (no additional custodial time).

Obiter and limits

  • The accused was lucky he was not shot by police given he waved a pellet gun in a confrontational setting
  • The accused had a horrific childhood involving neglect, foster care and sexual abuse which the court noted in mitigation
  • The accused completed multiple rehabilitation programs while on remand

Court disposition

Accused convicted on Count 2 (common assault) and Count 3 (use of a firearm or imitation in commission of an offence); sentence imposed consistent with joint submission and mandatory minimums.

  • Count 3: One year imprisonment, time served (credit applied)
  • Count 2: 30 days custody concurrent to time served (no additional custody)
  • Eighteen months probation with conditions: keep the peace and be of good behaviour; appear when required; notify court/probation officer of any change of name, address or employment; report in person to probation office within 24 hours of release and thereafter as directed; provide residential address and phone number to probation officer and not change without written notice
  • No contact (direct or indirect) with victim Soo Hyun Won
  • Not to attend Queensway Court Motel at 1616 Queensway Street, Prince George, or be within 100 metres of that location
  • Not possess any weapon as defined in s.2 of the Criminal Code
  • Not possess any knife outside residence except for immediate preparation/eating of food or employment-related purposes
  • Pursuant to s.109 Criminal Code: prohibited for life from possessing any firearm, crossbow, restricted weapon, prohibited weapon, prohibited device, ammunition, prohibited ammunition or explosive substance
  • Forfeiture and destruction of the Crosman .357 pellet gun seized by police
  • DNA order under s.487.051 authorizing taking of bodily samples for National DNA Databank registration (Form 5.03)

Source and reliance status

Supreme Court of British Columbia · 20 January 2016

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Supreme Court of British Columbia

Judgment· 20 January 2016

2016 BCSC 203

2016 BCSC 203 R. v. Wilson

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: R. v. Wilson, 2016 BCSC 203 Date: 20160120 Docket: 41782-2 Registry: Prince George Regina v. Brent Lane Wilson Before: The Honourable Mr. Justice R.S. Tindale Oral Reasons for Sentence Counsel for the Crown: T. Bauman Counsel for the Accused: F. Fatt Place and Date of Hearing: Prince George, B.C. January 20, 2016 Place and Date of Sentence: Prince George, B.C. January 20, 2016 [1] THE COURT: Mr. Brent Lane Wilson, on Indictment 41782-2, has entered a plea of guilty on Count 2 to common assault, pursuant to s. 266 of the Criminal Code. He has also entered a plea of guilty to Count 3 which is charge that on or about May 3rd, 2015 at or near Prince George, in the Province of British Columbia, he did use a firearm or an imitation of a firearm while committing an offence or attempting to commit an indictable offence, contrary to s. 85 of the Criminal Code. [2] The circumstances surrounding Mr. Wilson's arrest on May 3rd, 2015 are that he and his common law spouse, Brittany Lolly, were staying at the Queensway Court Motel which is located at 1616 Queensway Street in the City of Prince George and became embroiled in a dispute with the manager and owner of that property, Mr. Won. Mr. Won felt that Mr. Wilson had taken some surveillance equipment. [3] There was a struggle that ensued. Mr. Won pushed Mr. Wilson out of the office. Mr.

Wilson took a couple of swings at Mr. Won and then very foolishly and really without any explanation, pulled out a Crosman 357 pellet gun and waved that around, causing considerable concern obviously by Mr. Won, the police and the community. Quite frankly, Mr. Wilson I am sure realizes it is lucky he was not shot on that day given the response of the police. [4] In any event, he has pled guilty to those offences. It is a joint submission for one year time served. There is a mandatory minimum penalty of one year on Count 3. Mr. Wilson has been in custody since May 3rd, 2015 which is a little over eight months which given the principles in R. v. Summers would give him a little over one year of pre-trial detention credit. Also, the joint submissions include a probation order for 18 months with conditions. [5] Mr. Wilson has a lengthy record with convictions for assault and theft-related convictions. I am told by Mr. Fatt, counsel for Mr. Wilson, that he was born November 20, 1990 in the Burns Lake area. He was raised initially by his grandparents and then left school in Grade 2, lived with his aunt and uncle for a period of time where he was beaten and locked in a closet. He went into foster care, and in his own words, describes it as they forgot about him. He has been a victim, as well, of being sexually assaulted. As Mr. Fatt describes it, he had a horrific childhood. [6] Mr.

Fatt indicates that while in custody on remand, Mr. Wilson has completed a number of programs including a substance abuse management program, an orientation and a skills program, a healthy relationships skills program, a nutrition skills program, another healthy relationships skills program, a program called "Learn to Learn for Life" and a communication skills program as well as other programs that Mr. Wilson has told me about here today. [7] Madam Clerk, we will mark the package of photocopies of the certificates of Mr. Wilson as the next Exhibit 2 collectively on sentencing. [8] I will start I will start with Count 3. There is a minimum of one year in jail required. Mr. Wilson certainly has been in custody for over eight months and is entitled to credit for 12 months. So I will accede to the joint submission. There will be one year on Count 3, time served to be followed by 18 months probation with the following conditions. [9] First sir, you shall keep the peace and be of good behaviour. [10] Second, you will appear before the Court when required to do so by the Court. [11] Third, you shall notify the Court or the probation officer in advance of any change of name or address and promptly notify the Court or the probation officer of any change of employment or occupation. [12] Within 24 hours after being released from custody you shall report in person to the probation office

located at 101 - 250 George Street, Prince George, B.C. and after that you shall report as and when directed by the probation officer. [13] When first reporting to the probation officer you shall inform him of your present residential address and phone number and you shall not change your address or phone number at any time without first providing written notice to the probation officer. [14] The next condition will be that you shall have no contact or communication directly or indirectly with the victim, Soo Hyun Won in this matter. [15] Also, you shall not attend at the Queensway Court Motel located at 1616 Queensway Street in the City of Prince George, Province of British Columbia, or be within 100 metres of that location. [16] You shall not possess any weapon as defined in s. 2 of the Criminal Code. [17] You shall not possess any knife outside of your residence except for the immediate preparation or eating of food or for purposes directly and immediately related to your employment. [18] Also, with regard to Count 3, I will make an order pursuant to s. 109 of the Criminal Code that you are prohibited from possessing any firearm, crossbow, restricted weapon, prohibited weapon, prohibited device, ammunition, prohibited ammunition, explosive substance for life. [19] I also make an order that the pellet gun that was seized by the police in this matter be forfeited to the Crown

for destruction. [20] Mr. Bauman, is this a primary or a secondary designated offence for the DNA? [21] MR. BAUMAN: That is a good question. I know that -- [22] THE COURT: I think it is primary. I think section - [23] MR. BAUMAN: -- 266 is discretionary, but I think 85 makes it apply here. [24] THE COURT: I find it is primary. In any event, I am going to make a DNA order on Count 3. So, pursuant to s. 487.051 of the Criminal Code, I am making an order in Form 5.03 authorizing the taking of the number of samples of bodily substances by any peace officer for the Province of British Columbia that is reasonably required for the purpose of forensic DNA analysis and registration in the National DNA Databank. [25] Do you understand the conditions of the probation, sir? [26] THE ACCUSED: Yes. [27] THE COURT: All right. So, with regard to Count 3, that will be the sentence. On Count 2, given the record I am going to sentence you to 30 days custody, however, that will be concurrent. Sorry, I cannot do that. Thirty days will be concurrent to the time served, so one day. [28] THE ACCUSED: Thanks a lot. [29] THE COURT: All right. Thank you. "R.S. Tindale, J."

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

R. v. Summers

Case cited

Criminal Code s.2 (definition of weapon)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Criminal Code s.85

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Criminal Code s.109

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Criminal Code s.266

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Criminal Code s.487.051

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Criminal Code Form 5.03

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.