R. v. Zietsoff
- Citation
- 2009 BCCA 532
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Court
- British Columbia Court of Appeal
- Decision
- 19 November 2009
- Posture
- Criminal — Sentence Appeal / Court of Appeal Determination on Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- British Columbia Court of Appeal
- Decision
- 19 November 2009
- Posture
- Criminal — Sentence Appeal / Court of Appeal Determination on Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Court granted an extension of time and leave to appeal and allowed the appeal to the extent of setting aside the two‑year probation order because the subsequent sentence rendered that probation order unlawful, following R. v. Pollock.
Court disposition
Appeal allowed in part; two‑year probation order set aside; extension of time for leave to appeal and leave to appeal granted.
Orders
- Extension of time for leave to appeal granted.
- Leave to appeal granted.
- Appeal allowed to the extent of setting aside the two‑year probation order.
02
Material facts
Parties
Regina
Respondent Counsel: M. BrundrettJohn William Zietsoff
Appellant Counsel: M.S.A. Fox03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal — Sentence Appeal / Court of Appeal Determination on Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether a two‑year probation order imposed on December 6, 2001 became unlawful as a result of a subsequent sentence imposed March 13, 2003
- 02
Whether the court should grant an extension of time for leave to appeal and grant leave to appeal in these circumstances
- 03
Whether the appropriate remedy is to set aside the probation order
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Appellant submitted that the two‑year probation order imposed on December 6, 2001 had become unlawful because a later sentence imposed March 13, 2003 superseded it; relied on R. v. Pollock (2005 BCCA 500) and sought extension of time and leave to appeal to set aside the probation order.
- Respondent
- Crown agreed that the two‑year probation order had become unlawful as a result of the subsequent sentence and did not oppose extension of time, leave to appeal, and setting aside the probation order.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
R. v. Pollock, 2005 BCCA 500
A probation order may be rendered unlawful by a subsequent incompatible sentence.
- 02
R. v. Pollock, 2005 BCCA 500
The Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to grant an extension of time and leave to appeal to correct unlawful sentencing orders.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Court granted an extension of time and leave to appeal and allowed the appeal to the extent of setting aside the two‑year probation order because the subsequent sentence rendered that probation order unlawful, following R. v. Pollock.
Court disposition
Appeal allowed in part; two‑year probation order set aside; extension of time for leave to appeal and leave to appeal granted.
- Extension of time for leave to appeal granted.
- Leave to appeal granted.
- Appeal allowed to the extent of setting aside the two‑year probation order.
Source and reliance status
British Columbia Court of Appeal · 19 November 2009
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
British Columbia Court of Appeal
Judgment· 19 November 2009
2009 BCCA 532 R. v. Zietsoff
COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: R. v. Zietsoff, 2009 BCCA 532 Date: 20091119 Docket: CA036794; CA036795 Between: Regina Respondent And John William Zietsoff Appellant Before: The Honourable Madam Justice Prowse The Honourable Madam Justice Newbury The Honourable Mr. Justice Lowry On appeal from: Provincial Court of British Columbia, December 5, 2001 (R. v. Zietsoff, Vancouver Reg. 127353-1-D, 127388-1, 127389-D, 128032-1-HT) Oral Reasons for Judgment Counsel for the Appellant: M.S.A. Fox Counsel for the (Crown) Respondent: M. Brundrett Place and Date of Hearing: Vancouver, British Columbia November 19, 2009 Place and Date of Judgment: Vancouver, British Columbia November 19, 2009 [1] PROWSE J.A.: This is a sentence appeal in which counsel agree that a two year probation order imposed on Mr. Zietsoff by the Honourable Judge Arnold on December 6, 2001 has become unlawful as a result of a subsequent sentence imposed on Mr. Zietsoff by the Honourable Judge Sinclair on March 13, 2003. [2] The relevant authority relied on by counsel is R. v. Pollock, 2005 BCCA 500. In the result, I would grant Mr. Zietsoff's application for an extension of time for leave to appeal the sentence of December 6, 2001. I would grant leave to appeal and I would allow the appeal, but only to the extent of setting aside the two year probation order. [3] NEWBURY J.A.: I agree. [4] LOWRY J.A.: I agree. [5] PROWSE J.A.: So ordered. "The Honourable Madam Justice Prowse"
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.