Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Evidence 2022 BCSC 2304

Somers v. MacLellan

Oral voir dire ruling admitting defence accident reconstruction reports despite Rule 11-6 objections, hearsay concerns, and alleged expert bias.

  • Admissibility of expert evidence
  • Mohan criteria
  • Rule 11-6 compliance
  • Expert bias
  • Hearsay reliance
  • Necessity of expert
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2021 BCSC 371

R. v. Macdonald

The court found Cole Macdonald guilty of two counts of impaired driving causing death after drug impairment evidence, witness observations, and reconstruction showed he crossed into oncoming traffic.

  • Impaired driving
  • Causation
  • Hearsay (principled exception)
  • Expert evidence
  • Toxicology interpretation
  • Impaired-driving
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2012 BCSC 1786

R. v. Wengenmayr

The court convicted the accused of impaired driving and over-80 offences causing bodily harm and death after finding his alcohol level and impairment caused the collision.

  • Impaired driving
  • Over-80 mg blood alcohol offence
  • Causation
  • Dangerous driving
  • Kienapple principle
  • Impaired-driving
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2012 BCSC 471

R. v. Bekkers

Trial judgment on fatal Highway 1 collision charges. The court found the driving objectively dangerous in black ice conditions, but not impairment beyond a reasonable doubt.

  • Dangerous driving
  • Impaired driving
  • Causation
  • Mens rea (marked departure)
  • Circumstantial evidence
  • Expert opinion admissibility
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2009 NSSC 422

R. v. Oulton

Trial judge accepted forensic toxicology retrograde extrapolation and accident reconstruction, disbelieved accused's account of post-accident drinking and other explanations, and found beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused was impaired at the time of the collision (estimated BAC ~1.49–1.99 at 9:15 p.m.) and that this impairment was a significant contributing cause of the collision and of the resulting bodily harm; accordingly the accused was convicted of the charged offences.

  • Impaired driving
  • Care and control
  • Causation
  • Retrograde extrapolation
  • Expert evidence
  • Credibility assessment
Read case analysis
Motor vehicle law 2006 BCSC 1236

Abay v. Keung and Yuen

The court found both drivers partly at fault in a Vancouver collision: the left-turning plaintiff failed to yield, while the defendant’s lane change, speed and lookout also contributed.

  • Left-turn right-of-way
  • Duty of care of dominant driver
  • Comparative negligence allocation
  • Speed as contributing cause
  • Cell phone distraction
  • Credibility findings
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.