Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Tax

Russell v. The King

The Tax Court struck specified paragraphs of the Amended Notice of Appeal, holding they alleged CRA misconduct, Charter breaches, and relief outside its jurisdiction.

  • Motion to strike
  • Jurisdiction of the tax court of canada
  • Reasonable grounds for appeal
  • Procedural fairness
  • Abuse of process
  • Section 7 charter
Read case analysis
Tax law

Traductions Sematos Inc. v. His Majesty the King

The Tax Court upheld the Minister’s COVID-relief determinations, finding Traductions Sematos Inc. did not prove a normal accounting practice of including unbilled WIP in revenue.

  • Covid relief eligibility
  • Qualifying revenue
  • Accounting practices
  • Amendment of pleadings
  • Rule 98 discovery
  • Income-tax
Read case analysis
Tax

Harris v. The King

The Tax Court dismissed a motion to stop CRA collection and return garnished funds, holding it lacked jurisdiction for that relief; the records request was premature.

  • Gst/hst reassessment appeal
  • Collection and garnishment
  • Injunction / stay of collection
  • Court jurisdiction
  • Timetable order / discovery
  • Gst-hst
Read case analysis
Tax law

Xu v. The King

The Tax Court quashed Mr. Xu’s application for an extension of time to object to a GST/HST assessment, finding it was filed after the 30-day jurisdictional limit.

  • Gst/hst assessment
  • Extension of time to object
  • Jurisdiction
  • Notice of assessment
  • Cra appeals division
  • Gst-hst-assessment
Read case analysis
Immigration law 2026 FC 631

Brar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

The Federal Court granted judicial review of a refusal under the Agri-Food Pilot, finding the officer failed to engage with key evidence about the employer’s NAICS 1114 eligibility.

  • Agri-food pilot
  • Permanent residence eligibility
  • Naics classification
  • Standard of review
  • Agri-food-pilot
  • Judicial-review
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2026 FC 633

Seydanoglu v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a CRA decision denying CRBA benefits, finding the officer reasonably concluded the applicant failed to prove eligible income and a COVID-19-related income reduction.

  • Eligibility criteria
  • Reasonableness review
  • Self-employment income
  • Income verification
  • Canada recovery benefits act
  • Judicial-review
Read case analysis
Constitutional law 2026 FC 632

Best v. Racicot

The Federal Court dismissed Casey Best’s late motion to extend time and reopen a strike order, finding no sufficient basis to revisit the pleadings.

  • Charter s7 and s15 claims
  • Motion to strike (strike pleadings)
  • Extension of time under federal court rules
  • Reconsideration (rule 397)
  • Variance (rule 399)
  • Appeal of discretionary orders (rule 51)
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2026 FC 629

Mathur v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Federal Court found the CERB review decision unreasonable because its reasons were largely unintelligible and did not show a coherent line of analysis.

  • Reasonableness review
  • Cerb eligibility
  • Adequacy of reasons
  • Remittal
  • Reasonableness-review
  • Cerb-eligibility
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2026 NLCA 17

Mansfield v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Newfoundland and Labrador

Seal's application for security for costs was dismissed because he failed to demonstrate Mansfield would be unable to pay his costs on appeal and Mansfield showed the appeal was reasonably or fairly apparent to have merit; additionally, the court noted that intervenor costs are not routinely awarded and must be justified, so ordering security was not warranted.

  • Security for costs
  • Intervention
  • Costs of intervenor
  • Appellate review of discretionary orders
  • Stay of costs
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2026 FC 626

Canada (Military Police Complaints Commission) v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Federal Court dismissed the MPCC’s judicial review applications, holding OPS conduct-complaint investigations are not policing duties or functions and disclosure was not compelled for the public interest investigation.

  • Mandamus
  • Judicial review
  • Disclosure obligations
  • Oversight of military police
  • Public interest investigation
  • Jurisdiction of mpcc
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.