Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Medical negligence 2025 BCSC 1528

Lalani v. Lear

The court dismissed Omar Lalani’s medical negligence claim against his childhood orthodontist, finding cervical headgear was standard practice in 1989 and no proven causal link to OSA.

  • Orthodontic treatment
  • Cervical headgear
  • Obstructive sleep apnea (osa)
  • Standard of care
  • Expert evidence
  • Informed consent
Read case analysis
Tort 2025 BCSC 612

D.W.P. v. Owner

The court held Driver liable in negligence and battery after a motorcycle collision during a psychotic episode, and found Owner vicariously liable under s. 86.

  • Insanity/mental illness as defence in tort
  • Admissibility and weight of psychiatric expert evidence
  • Causation
  • Assessment of damages (non-pecuniary, past and future earning capacity, future care)
  • Publication ban and anonymization
  • Mental-illness-defence-in-tort
Read case analysis
Defamation 2020 BCSC 1398

Universe v. Fraser Health Authority

The court dismissed two related tort actions arising from a hospital incident, rejecting claims in defamation, battery, malicious prosecution, negligence, and privacy.

  • Summary trial suitability
  • Qualified privilege
  • Justification (truth)
  • Self-defence and third-party defence
  • Vexatious litigant
  • Hospital records admissibility and waiver
Read case analysis
Tort 2014 BCSC 1570

Pacheco v. Degife

The court found Degife liable for battering Pacheco with a baseball bat, dismissed the claim against Wong, and reduced Pacheco’s damages for his own fault.

  • Identity of assailant
  • Self-defence
  • Volenti non fit injuria / consent
  • Ex turpi causa
  • Provocation
  • Apportionment of liability
Read case analysis
Medical malpractice 2013 NSSC 421

Durham v. Mahmoud-Ahmed

The court granted the defendants' motions in part: it ordered further and better particulars for specified paragraphs against the physician and the hospital where pleadings were bald or overly broad, denied particulars where the Statement of Claim provided sufficient context, held that affidavits are not mandatory for such motions in Nova Scotia, and awarded costs of $750 to each defendant payable in the cause.

  • Particulars
  • Pleadings
  • Informed consent
  • Vicarious liability
  • Damages
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Tort 2005 BCSC 175

A.H. v. Ho

The British Columbia Supreme Court rejected a battery claim but found the surgeon negligent for an excessively long incision and dog ears after a hysterectomy.

  • Non-consensual surgery
  • Standard of care
  • Causation
  • Mitigation
  • Psychological harm
  • Scar revision
Read case analysis
Tort 2000 BCSC 1137

Kellins v. Grotkopp

The court held that the defendant’s active resistance to police removal from a pub constituted battery, making him liable for the officer’s soft tissue injuries.

  • Resisting removal/arrest
  • Use of force by police
  • Causation of injury
  • Damages assessment
  • Subrogation
  • Liability of citizen for injury to officer
Read case analysis
Torts [1993] 2 SCR 119

Ciarlariello v. Schacter

The Supreme Court of Canada held that the patient validly consented to continue an angiogram after briefly withdrawing consent, and dismissed claims in battery and negligence.

  • Informed consent
  • Withdrawal of consent during procedure
  • Duty to disclose
  • Materiality of risk
  • Causation
  • Informed-consent
Read case analysis
Medical negligence [1980] 2 SCR 192

Hopp v. Lepp

Le Tribunal suprême du Canada confirme qu’un consentement médical est valable si le patient a reçu une divulgation suffisante des risques matériels et particuliers.

  • Duty of disclosure
  • Consent validity
  • Material and special risks
  • Causation
  • Damages
  • Informed-consent
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.