Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2018 BCSC 2125

R. v. Dunlop

Sentencing reasons for Aaron James Dunlop: a global custodial sentence, probation, a DNA order and a 10-year firearms prohibition were imposed for assault, weapons and breach offences.

  • Assault with a weapon
  • Possession of a weapon dangerous to the public peace
  • Mischief
  • Breach of recognizance
  • Probation conditions
  • Dna order
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2014 NSPC 72

R. v. Smith

Because the offender acted as a lookout and has significant cognitive impairments and rehabilitative supports, his degree of responsibility is lower than principals; applying proportionality, parity and totality the appropriate penalty for the most serious offence (break and enter/theft) is reduced into a 21–24 month range; the aggregate effective sentence is less than two years so a Conditional Sentence Order of 23 months less one day in the community under strict conditions is both available and appropriate; concurrent short terms imposed for theft of vehicle and flight from police and a co…

  • Sentencing principles
  • Proportionality
  • Parity
  • Totality
  • Availability and appropriateness of conditional sentence order
  • Electronic monitoring
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2014 NSSC 223

R. v. R.R.D.G.

Given the aggravating factors (longstanding grooming, abuse of position of trust, persistence, minimal mitigation and poor prospects for rehabilitation) a fit sentence is five years' custody for the principal sexual touching offence (s.153(a)) with the s.151 offence stayed as duplicative; a 12-month sentence on s.271(1)(a) to be served concurrently with the five-year term; two indictable breaches of s.145(3) each sentenced to six months custody concurrent to each other but ordered consecutive to the five-year sentence; pre-sentence custody of 107 days was credited at 1.5:1 (160.5 days) pursua…

  • Sexual assault
  • Sexual interference
  • Position of trust
  • Pre-sentence custody credit
  • Ancillary orders
  • Risk assessment
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2012 NSSC 126

R. v. McInnis

Court accepted the joint recommendation and sentenced the accused to time served (one year and two weeks) on s.423.1(b), imposed the mandatory minimum three years custody for the s.95(1) weapons offence starting immediately, imposed 30 days for the s.145(3) breach to be served concurrently, granted the s.109 order and s.487 DNA order, and waived victim fine surcharges.

  • Mandatory minimum
  • Time served
  • Concurrent sentences
  • Victim fine surcharge waiver
  • Section 109 recognizance order
  • Section 487 dna order
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2005 BCCA 318

R. v. Caza

The Court of Appeal upheld sentence dispositions for repeated breaches of a recognizance protecting children, including jail and a three-year probation order.

  • Breach of recognizance
  • Probation order
  • Sentence appeal
  • Allocution (s.726)
  • Deterrence
  • Grooming
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2001 BCCA 365

R. v. Heward

The Court of Appeal upheld concurrent custodial sentences for breach of recognizance and sexual assault, but set aside a 20-year s.161 order and replaced it with a probation condition.

  • Sexual assault of a minor
  • Breach of recognizance
  • S.161 order
  • Conditional sentence
  • Fitness of sentence
  • Probation terms
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.