Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil contempt 2025 BCSC 2208

Nanaimo (City) v. Bernier

The City of Nanaimo’s contempt application was dismissed. The court found paragraph 3 of the earlier order was not clear enough and, in any event, Mr. Bernier took reasonable steps to comply.

  • Contempt of court
  • Compliance with court orders
  • Permit expiry
  • Impossibility of compliance
  • Discretionary relief
  • Civil-contempt
Read case analysis
Municipal law 2025 BCCA 19

Surrey (City) v. Kallu

The Court of Appeal dismissed Surrey’s appeal, holding that officials’ evidence based on unidentified City records was hearsay and that no adjournment was warranted.

  • Hearsay
  • Business records exception
  • Adjournment discretion
  • Burden of proof
  • Declaratory relief
  • Injunctive relief
Read case analysis
Municipal law 2022 BCSC 2182

North Saanich (District) v. Rawlins

The court granted a statutory injunction for zoning and building bylaw breaches on the property, but suspended part of it for eight months to reduce tenant hardship.

  • Statutory injunction
  • Zoning bylaw enforcement
  • Building bylaw enforcement
  • Secondary suite regulation
  • Stop work order
  • Density prohibition
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2022 BCSC 1487

Taylor v. Vancouver (City)

La Cour suprême de la Colombie-Britannique a jugé raisonnables la suspension des permis et l’exigence d’une nouvelle demande, et a rejeté la demande de mandamus.

  • Character retention incentives
  • Development permits
  • Building permits suspension
  • Mandamus
  • Reasonableness review
  • Statutory interpretation
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2021 BCCA 261

The Architectural Institute of British Columbia v. Langford (City)

La Corte de Apelación de Columbia Británica confirmó que era irrazonable otorgar un permiso de construcción para un edificio diseñado en contravención de la Architects Act.

  • Reasonableness review
  • Public interest standing
  • Architects act compliance
  • Building permits
  • Delegation of municipal authority
  • Conflict of laws
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2020 BCCA 142

0940460 BC Ltd. v. Burnaby (City)

The Court of Appeal upheld Burnaby’s refusal of preliminary plan approval, finding the pizza oven, patio structure, and donor parking issues were reasonably relied on.

  • Preliminary plan approval
  • Lot coverage
  • Building permits
  • Fettering of discretion
  • Donor parking
  • Estoppel and permits
Read case analysis
Property law 2020 BCSC 594

Suncourt Homes Ltd. v. Cloutier

The court clarified its reasons in a statutory building scheme dispute, correcting a statement about the plaintiff’s position while leaving the trial result unchanged.

  • Statutory building scheme
  • Restrictive covenants
  • Developer approval
  • Finished grade
  • Breach of covenant
  • Renovation and reconstruction
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2020 BCSC 455

Minster Enterprises Ltd. v. City of Richmond

The court held that excavation, structural fill, and preloading on the building footprint were “construction” under Richmond’s bylaw, so the permits did not expire.

  • Reasonableness review
  • Permit expiration
  • Statutory interpretation
  • Definition of construction
  • Alr (agricultural land reserve) issues
  • Administrative-law
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2020 BCSC 454

Yu v. City of Richmond

The Court quashed Richmond’s decision that the petitioners’ permits had expired, holding that soil densification and preloading counted as construction under the bylaw.

  • Permit expiry
  • Construction definition
  • Soil densification/preloading
  • Site preparation
  • Judicial review - reasonableness
  • Remittal vs final determination
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2019 NSCA 96

Hughes v. Cumberland (Municipality)

The Registrar's motion to dismiss was granted because the appellant failed to perfect the appeal by the prescribed deadline, did not provide a credible or evidenced explanation for the default, failed to demonstrate arguable grounds or an intention and ability to comply with future directions, and dismissal was justified in the court's discretion; costs were refused.

  • Appeal procedure
  • Dismissal for non-compliance
  • Registrar motions
  • Self-represented litigant
  • Costs
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.