R. v Menu
On the criminal standard, the Crown proved that the accused had constructive possession and primary control of large quantities of dried cannabis and cannabis concentrates located throughout the residence and basement, supported by inventory sheets in his hand, fingerprints, cash, packaging materials and expert evidence, and therefore was guilty of possessing cannabis for the purpose of distribution and sale (ss.9(2) and 10(2) Cannabis Act); the accused was guilty of possession of cocaine for the purpose of trafficking by virtue of constructive possession and/or by aiding the basement occupan…
Source excerpt
- Possession for the purpose of trafficking
- Constructive possession
- Joint possession
- Circumstantial evidence
- Search of residence
- Expert opinion on drug distribution