Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Contract law 2007 NSSM 50

Middlemass v. North American Van Lines Inc.

The carrier breached the contract (including an implied term) by failing to advise the claimant of the specific original-title documentation required to clear Customs and by not promptly ascertaining requirements after the vehicle was held; therefore the carrier is liable for the claimant's mitigated rental costs of $4,886.00 plus filing fee of $80.00.

  • Breach of contract
  • Implied terms
  • Mitigation of damages
  • Duty to advise
  • International vehicle transport
Read case analysis
Transportation [1981] 2 SCR 219

Canadian Pacific Ltd. v. McCain Produce Co. Ltd. et al.

The Supreme Court of Canada held that section 4 of the bill of lading conditions did not bar the respondents’ claim for consequential damages.

  • Bills of lading
  • Limitation of liability clauses
  • Consequential damages
  • Bills-of-lading
  • Limitation-of-liability-clauses
  • Consequential-damages
Read case analysis
Sale of goods [1974] SCR 903

Beaver Specialty Ltd. v. Donald H. Bain Ltd.

The Supreme Court held the walnuts were to be delivered f.o.b. Toronto, so Beaver had not accepted them under s. 33 and could refuse damaged goods.

  • Transfer of property
  • Acceptance of goods
  • F.o.b. interpretation
  • Carrier liability
  • Statutory inspection rights (s.33)
  • Sale-of-goods
Read case analysis
Maritime/admiralty [1971] SCR 522

Charles Goodfellow Lumber Sales Ltd. v. Verreault et al.

The Supreme Court of Canada held that the cargo loss was not shown to be due to perils of the sea and that the carrier had not proved due diligence to make the vessel seaworthy.

  • Seaworthiness
  • Perils of the sea
  • Due diligence to make ship seaworthy
  • Burden of proof under water carriage of goods act
  • Limitation of liability
  • Charter/ownership
Read case analysis
Maritime law [1942] SCR 357

Insurance Company of North America v. Colonial Steamships Ltd.

The Supreme Court of Canada held that an insurer could not sue as endorsee of bills of lading where the endorsement did not pass property, and allowed the carrier’s general average counterclaim.

  • Endorsement of bill of lading
  • Section 2 bills of lading act
  • Transfer of property by endorsement
  • Insurer taking over damaged goods
  • Liability for general average contribution
  • Termination of carriage and winter storage
Read case analysis
Transportation [1923] SCR 84

Premier Lumber Co. v. Grand Trunk Pac. Railway Co.

Appeal from British Columbia in a lumber shipment dispute turned on misdelivery, notice of loss, and the scope of liability under a standard bill of lading.

  • Misdelivery
  • Bills of lading
  • Notice of loss clause
  • Liability of initial carrier for connecting carrier
  • Warehouseman liability
  • Straight bill of lading
Read case analysis
Transportation (1920) 60 SCR 442

Montreal Cotton and Wool Waste Co. v. Canada Steamship Lines

The Supreme Court of Canada held that a bill of lading valuing goods at shipment required market value at shipment, not the buyer’s contract cost price.

  • Measure of damages
  • Bill of lading clause interpretation
  • Market value vs cost price
  • Validity of limitation clause under 9 & 10 ed. vii, ch. 61 s.4
  • Carrier-liability
  • Bill-of-lading
Read case analysis
Transportation (1919) 59 SCR 643

Canadian S.S. Lines v. Grain Growers Export Co.

The Supreme Court of Canada held that a barge was not seaworthy at the outset and that s. 964 of the Canada Shipping Act did not relieve the carrier from liability.

  • Seaworthiness
  • Liability for damaged cargo
  • Statutory defences
  • Canada shipping act s.964
  • Cargo-damage
  • Statutory-defence
Read case analysis
Contract (1903) 33 SCR 432

Wilson v. Canadian Development Co.

The Supreme Court of Canada held that a carrier could not rely on a stamped limitation clause to avoid liability for wrongful sale and conversion of goods shipped under an earlier special contract.

  • Shipping receipt
  • Limitation of liability
  • Negligence
  • Wrongful conversion
  • Bill of lading
  • Variation of contract
Read case analysis
Maritime law (1896) 26 SCR 272

Owen v. Outerbridge

El Tribunal confirmó la responsabilidad del armador por no transbordar ni entregar a tiempo un cargamento perecedero tras la avería del buque, con daños por conversión.

  • Charterparty
  • Transhipment
  • Perishable goods
  • Repairs and reasonable time
  • Lien and freight
  • Damages for conversion
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.