Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Tax Court allowed Mr. Toews’ appeal, finding the Minister had not proved any person was liable under the tax shelter penalty provisions to justify the reassessment.
The Tax Court dismissed Eric Aidoo’s appeal over GLGI-related charitable donation claims for the 2007 taxation year, finding no donative intent and rejecting ancillary arguments.
The Tax Court dismissed Stephen Takacs’ 2007 income tax appeal, finding he failed to prove a valid charitable gift under the Canadian Humanitarian Trust program.
The motion is granted in part: because JNF pleaded a tenable bias ground, CRA must disclose further relevant materials in its possession relating to the bias allegation and communications with the public, must add identified missing documents and draft media lines, and must undertake a supplementary search by senior CRA officials with an updated affidavit and certificate filed within 30 days; privilege redactions must be justified through a process requiring written representations and sealed unredacted materials for the Court's review; taxpayer information redactions are not ordered removed.
Source excerpt
The Federal Court dismissed Ne'eman Foundation Canada’s motion to set aside a jeopardy order, finding the Minister’s evidence sufficient and disclosure adequate.
Given divided success on the appeal and that both parties reasonably sought to adduce fresh evidence that the court did not need to consider, each party must bear its own costs; the sealing order was denied because the competing privacy and safety interests can be adequately protected by limited redactions to the CRA final audit in accordance with Centa J.'s prior order, with redacted versions to form the public record and unredacted versions filed under seal accessible only with leave.
Source excerpt
The Court found on objective evidence that the transactions were integrated: the immediate reimbursements by Talisker and simultaneous exchange of cheques demonstrated the Appellant received significant benefits (effectively interest-free loans) linked to the claimed donations, eliminating impoverishment and donative intent; therefore the contributions were not gifts within s.118.1 and the reassessments are upheld.
Source excerpt
The Court refused the appellant's request for additional production because the Minister produced the certified tribunal record and swore that it contained all material before the decision-maker relevant to the appeal, the appellant failed to demonstrate the relevance or existence of additional documents or provide evidence of discrimination or bias that would justify broader disclosure, and Rule 317 does not require creation of documents or permit fishing expeditions.
Source excerpt
The appeal is dismissed because the CKF official receipt failed to comply with s.3501(1)(d) of the Income Tax Regulations (it did not show the place of issuance) rendering the receipt invalid, and independently the appellant failed to prove he acquired legal title to the pharmaceuticals or that any transfer of property occurred; the taxpayer did not demolish the Minister's assumptions and admissible audit evidence supported the Minister's position.
Source excerpt
The motion judge properly dismissed the single-creditor bankruptcy application because the donations were irrevocable gifts creating no debt or debtor-creditor relationship, no act of bankruptcy or special circumstances were proven to justify a single-creditor petition, and the application constituted an abuse of process; the appellate court found no palpable and overriding error and upheld the dismissal and costs award.
Source excerpt
Explore more
