Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The court granted divorce, parenting, support, property, and tort relief, reassigned the family home 75/25 to the respondent, and awarded damages for battery.
Court held the parties separated by no later than August 2013, barring the respondentâs FLA property and spousal support claims. Child support was recalculated; assault and trust claims failed.
The court held that funds advanced by Mme. Nabi were gifts, not loans, ordered unequal division of Surrey property proceeds, granted retroactive child support, and dismissed her civil claim.
Family law trial over property, support, parenting, divorce, and counterclaims. The claimant failed to prove trusts over two homes, and the court made equalization and support orders.
The stay is refused because, although the appeal raises a non-frivolous issue, SP failed to establish irreparable harm or inability to repay any overpayment; the trial judgeâs imputation of income was within judicial discretion given SPâs non-disclosure and reliance on available corporate records; and the balance of inconvenience, weighed against the paramount interests of the children who primarily reside with HB, favors denying the stay.
Source excerpt
Family law trial on valuation and division of business interests in Simetra and Triquest, with child support recalculated and spousal support dismissed.
The court upheld but reapportioned a marriage agreement, ordered equal division of family assets, imputed income to the respondent, and kept the parenting schedule.
Family law trial on property division, support, and tax debts. The court granted divorce, divided assets and debts, and set ongoing child and spousal support.
The father proved an undue hardship circumstance (support for other children) and the court concluded his household standard of living is lower than the mother's; accordingly the court deviated from the table amount and fixed monthly support at $297.50 (including $50 to arrears) so the father's spending on this child equals his spending on his other children; the court declined to order additional contributions to health and extracurricular expenses as the amounts were not reasonable given the father's means but ordered enrollment in workplace health/dental insurance.
Source excerpt
La Cour dâappel de la Colombie-Britannique rejette lâappel visant Ă contester le rĂ©gime des pensions alimentaires pour enfants, jugeant lâaction irrecevable comme attaque collatĂ©rale et concluant Ă lâabsence de qualitĂ© pour agir.
Explore more
