Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Family law 2014 BCSC 2309

M.W.B. v. A.R.B.

Interim family-law reasons apportion prior costs to child support and maintenance for bankruptcy purposes, and issue interim parenting and communication orders.

  • Apportionment of costs
  • Bankruptcy discharge and exceptions (bia s.178)
  • Costs allocation between support and property issues
  • Special costs and penalties for non-disclosure
  • Change of child residence
  • Parenting time and communication orders
Read case analysis
Family law 2010 BCSC 1763

A.E.B. v. S.A.B.

Family law decision on reapportionment, child support arrears, and division of business and home assets after separation and divorce.

  • Reapportionment under s.65
  • Division of matrimonial assets
  • Valuation of assets
  • Child support guidelines s.7 expenses
  • Enforcement via fmep
  • Custody and guardianship
Read case analysis
Family law 2009 NSSC 170

Clarke v. Gale

Because a material change in circumstances existed (irreconcilable parental conflict, communication breakdown, changed income), joint custody was no longer feasible; sole custody to Ms. Clarke was retained because she remained the stable primary caregiver and could meet the child's needs provided ordered therapeutic interventions; access to Mr. Gale was preserved under a detailed schedule; income for support was imputed to Mr. Gale for calculation purposes and a limited retroactive award was appropriate but its lump-sum payment was suspended until resolution of Mr. Gale's unresolved equity in…

  • Variation of custody order
  • Material change of circumstances
  • Best interests of the child
  • Access rights
  • Retroactive child support
  • Imputation of income
Read case analysis
Family law 2000 NSCA 129

Ffrench v. Ffrench

The stay was denied because the appellant did not provide sufficient evidence to satisfy the Fulton test: while an arguable issue was accepted for present purposes, the court could not assess irreparable harm or the balance of convenience due to lack of affidavits/evidence and no exceptional circumstances were demonstrated; accordingly the stay was dismissed.

  • Stay of execution
  • Maintenance order
  • Garnishment
  • Custody
  • Standard for granting stays
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.