Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Family law 2024 BCSC 1803

Block v. Block

The court set aside BCI share division clauses in a separation agreement for unconscionability, awarded equitable compensation, and varied child and spousal support.

  • Unconscionability
  • Separation agreement
  • Full and frank financial disclosure
  • Spousal support
  • Child support
  • Variation under divorce act s.17
Read case analysis
Tax law 2024 TCC 81

Cheema v. The King

The Court found, on the balance of probabilities, that the Appellant made misrepresentations in his 2016 return by failing to report the disposition gain on the Property and by failing to adequately explain deposits identified in the BMO bank deposit analysis; those misrepresentations were attributable to neglect, carelessness or wilful default, entitling the Minister to reassess under s.152(4); however the Court accepted adjustments reducing the Unreported Revenue by $19,132, and therefore allowed the appeal in part and referred the reassessment back to the Minister for reconsideration with…

  • Reassessment
  • Statute-barred years
  • Subsection 152(4)
  • Bank deposit analysis
  • Misrepresentation
  • Burden of proof
Read case analysis
Family law 2018 BCSC 221

Ren v. Emerson

The court dismissed a challenge to a 2005 separation agreement as statute-barred, awarded the claimant half the appreciation of a condo, and ordered spousal support.

  • Spousal support
  • Property division
  • Separation agreement
  • Setting aside agreement
  • Excluded property (fla s.85)
  • Limitation periods (fla s.198; fra)
Read case analysis
Family law 2012 ONCA 395

Martynko v. Martynko

The Court held the factual record supported a finding that separation occurred by May 2002, so the equalization claim filed in August 2008 was barred by the six‑year limitation in s.7(3); the appellant failed to meet the mandatory s.2(8) preconditions (lack of good faith delay and prejudice to respondent) so no extension was granted; spousal support was denied because the appellant failed to show financial need or dependency under s.33(8), with disclosed incomes indicating appellant earned more than respondent.

  • Equalization of net family property
  • Spousal support
  • Limitation period s.7(3) family law act
  • Extension of time s.2(8) family law act
  • Determination of date of separation
Read case analysis
Contract law 2011 BCSC 1644

Can-Auto Inspections Inc. v. Vascor, Ltd.

The court held Can-Auto did not prove restricted use of iSpect, found no complete binding post-termination licence, and dismissed the main liability claims.

  • Software licensing
  • Contract formation
  • Conversion
  • Unjust enrichment
  • Acquiescence/waiver/laches
  • Limitation period
Read case analysis
Equity 2010 BCCA 356

Antrobus v. Antrobus

The Court of Appeal upheld a finding of unjust enrichment arising from long-term family services, rejected a new limitation defence, and reduced damages to $100,000.

  • Unjust enrichment
  • Juristic reason
  • Constructive trust
  • Fraudulent conveyance
  • Limitation period
  • Quantification of restitution
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.