Leyland v. Peck
The claimant's claim was dismissed for non-appearance with notice and no adjournment requested; the defendant's counterclaim was dismissed because the claimant did not establish an adequate evidentiary foundation for claimed reputational losses and lost revenue, and the InspectR insurance deductible was not recoverable under the Small Claims Court Act and Regulations which preclude awarding agent or barrister fees or analogous legal-support costs.
Source excerpt
- Building inspection
- Breach of contract
- Counterclaim
- Reputational damage
- Insurance deductible
- Evidentiary foundation