Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
5 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2025 BCSC 1739

R. v. Taylor

Morgen Taylor was sentenced to a two-year-less-one-day conditional sentence, plus three years' probation, for aggravated assault causing catastrophic injury.

  • Aggravated assault
  • Conditional sentence order
  • Fitness for custody versus community sanction
  • Victim impact
  • Ancillary orders (dna, weapons prohibition)
  • Aggravated-assault
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2024 BCCA 123

R. v. T.H.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the Crown’s sentence appeal, holding that a harsh conditional sentence, probation, restitution and SOIRA conditions were not demonstrably unfit.

  • Proportionality
  • Moral culpability
  • Standard of review on appeal
  • Availability of conditional sentence
  • Denunciation and deterrence
  • Victim impact
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2022 ONCA 819

R. v. Antaya

The Court held that the sentencing judge did not err in principle or exercise of discretion, gave adequate consideration to relevant sentencing principles including proportionality and restraint, and reasonably concluded termination of the conditional sentence and commitment for the balance of the sentence was appropriate given the appellant's second deliberate breach and the seriousness and global context of the original offences; therefore the sentence was not demonstrably unfit.

  • Conditional sentence breach
  • Sentence appeal
  • Proportionality
  • Restraint
  • Presumption in favour of termination
  • S. 742.6(9) remedial options
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2014 BCSC 1267

R. v. Sam

The court imposed a conditional sentence of two years less one day for sexual touching of a child under 14, with strict supervision, curfew, counselling, and ancillary orders.

  • Conditional sentence (s.742.1)
  • Sentencing principles (denunciation, deterrence, rehabilitation)
  • Position of trust
  • Aggravating and mitigating factors
  • Dna order
  • Weapons prohibition (s.109)
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2008 NSPC 28

R. v. Withrow

The court found that a conditional sentence was not available because it was not satisfied that serving the sentence in the community would not endanger community safety given the accused's pattern of violent offending, repeated breaches of court-imposed constraints including deliberate flight from the jurisdiction, and the absence of demonstrated rehabilitation; accordingly the court imposed consecutive custodial sentences (6 months and 2 months) followed by probation and restitution.

  • Assault causing bodily harm
  • Failure to appear
  • Conditional sentence eligibility
  • Community safety assessment
  • Probation
  • Restitution
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2007 NSCA 65

R. v. Marsman

The sentencing judge overemphasized rehabilitation and under‑weighted denunciation and general deterrence for a vicious aggravated assault on an on‑duty police officer; the suspended sentence was clearly unreasonable and must be replaced with a custodial sentence of two years less one day, to be served in the community under strict, punitive conditions to address both denunciation/deterrence and rehabilitation.

  • Aggravated assault against police
  • Denunciation and general deterrence
  • Rehabilitation and mental illness as mitigation
  • Section 742.1 conditional sentence analysis
  • Standard of appellate review on sentence
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2005 NSCA 159

R. v. Partridge

The sentencing judge erred in principle by failing to consider the respondent's jumping bail and its implications for responsibility, compliance and community safety; the conditional sentence as originally imposed was demonstrably unfit, but given the respondent's post-sentence compliance and ongoing counselling the Court allowed the appeal and varied the sentence by extending the conditional sentence rather than imposing immediate custody, to achieve denunciation and deterrence while preserving rehabilitation.

  • Bail jumping
  • Conditional sentence
  • Denunciation and deterrence
  • Probation
  • Pre-sentence report
  • Breach of court orders
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2004 BCCA 581

R. v. Potter

The court upheld a 15-month jail sentence and three years’ probation for a mother who pleaded guilty to assault causing bodily harm to her infant daughter.

  • Sentencing principles
  • Conditional sentence availability
  • Breach of trust in parent-child abuse
  • Mitigating and aggravating factors
  • Probation orders
  • Sentencing-principles
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2002 BCCA 118

R. v. Lankin

The Court of Appeal upheld an 18-month custodial sentence for sexual offences against children, finding no error in refusing a conditional sentence.

  • Denunciation
  • General deterrence
  • Remorse
  • Breach of trust
  • Conditional sentence eligibility
  • Appellate deference
Read case analysis
Criminal law 1999 BCCA 258

R. v. R.J.E.

The Court of Appeal allowed the sentence appeal and replaced an 18-month custodial sentence for sexual assault with an 18-month conditional sentence.

  • Sexual assault of a minor
  • Breach of trust
  • Pre-sentence report
  • Kienapple principle
  • Conditional sentence eligibility
  • Sentencing principles
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.