Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
5 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2016 BCSC 1966

R. v. Dhaliwal

On a voir dire, the court excluded Bedi’s statements from Exhibit 24 onward, finding a reasonable doubt that RCMP conduct and inducements overbore his will.

  • Voluntariness
  • Right to silence
  • Admissibility of statements
  • Inducements and quid pro quo
  • Oppression
  • Right-to-silence
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2012 BCSC 2139

R. v. Hosack

The court held that Ernest Allan Hosack’s statement was voluntary and admissible, finding he had an operating mind and that police tactics did not overbear his will.

  • Voluntariness
  • Operating mind
  • Police trickery
  • Oppression
  • Voir dire
  • Admissibility of statements
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2005 SCC 5

R. v. Grandinetti

La Cour suprĂȘme rejette l’appel dans R. c. Grandinetti: les aveux faits Ă  des policiers infiltrĂ©s n’exigeaient pas de voir-dire sur la voluntaritĂ©, et la preuve visant un tiers a Ă©tĂ© exclue.

  • Admissibility of confessions
  • Person in authority
  • Voluntariness
  • Undercover operations
  • Third party evidence
  • Voir dire
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2004 BCCA 291

R. v. Skiffington

The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal from a second-degree murder conviction, holding the jury charge was adequate on fact-finding, exculpatory statements, and confession reliability.

  • Miller error (finding facts from evidence)
  • Hodgson warning (unreliability of confessions)
  • Use of exculpatory out‑of‑court statements
  • Admissibility of undercover confession
  • Miscarriage of justice
  • Jury-instructions
Read case analysis
Criminal law C35099

R. v. White

Confessions obtained after unrecorded interrogations where recording was available and no adequate substitute was shown are inadmissible; the trial judge failed to identify indicia of reliability and improperly admitted the statements; the trial judge's identification charge contained errors that vitiated identifications on specified counts; without the statements several verdicts were unreasonable, so convictions on counts 1,2,3 and 5 are quashed and a new trial ordered on count 4.

  • Voluntariness of confessions
  • Right to counsel
  • Admissibility of statements
  • Unrecorded police interrogations
  • Eyewitness identification jury charge
  • Unreasonable verdict
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2002 BCSC 1675

R. v. Evans

Voir dire on admissibility in a murder prosecution. The court held the accused’s right to counsel was not infringed and the challenged statements and photos were admissible.

  • Right to counsel
  • Voluntariness of statements
  • Charter s.10(b)
  • Interrogation techniques
  • Admissibility of evidence
  • Right-to-counsel
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2002 NSSC 134

R. v. Walsh

Given the persistent and deceptive interrogation techniques, threats concerning a person emotionally attached to the accused, lack of contemporaneous notes, extensive inaudible and unrecorded portions of interviews, the accused's limited sophistication and detention, the Crown failed to prove voluntariness beyond a reasonable doubt; therefore the statements and the tape recordings are inadmissible.

  • Voluntariness
  • Admissibility of statements
  • Right to counsel
  • Police trickery and deception
  • Threats and promises
  • Operating mind
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.