Botten v. Botten
Because E. became habitually resident in Italy when relocated in July 2025, s.6.3 of the Divorce Act removes this Court's jurisdiction to make the requested parenting and travel orders absent the child's presence in British Columbia and exceptional circumstances, which were not shown; a Separation Agreement cannot preserve jurisdiction contrary to s.6.3.
Source excerpt
- Habitual residence
- Jurisdiction under s.6.3 of the divorce act
- Relocation
- Parenting time
- Enforcement of separation agreements