Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
5 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Constitutional/charter 2025 BCSC 996

R. v. Dill

The court found no Charter breach on the initial search or delay to counsel, but held the undercover controlled delivery exceeded the implied licence to knock and breached s. 8.

  • Section 8 charter
  • Section 10(b) charter
  • Controlled delivery
  • General warrant
  • Implied licence to knock
  • Reasonable expectation of privacy
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2025 ONCA 392

R. v. Dunnett

The Court concluded the trial judge did not err in his s.11(b) findings, properly characterized and allocated delay, permissibly accepted the Crown's evidentiary record concerning unforeseen counsel and witness emergencies without requiring the absent Crown to testify, and reasonably applied sentencing principles such that the 15‑month concurrent sentence was not demonstrably unfit; however, the SOIRA order was unlawful insofar as it imposed a 10‑year term when statute required a minimum 20‑year term given the applicable maximum penalty, and the appropriate remedy was substitution of a 20‑yea…

  • Child luring
  • S.11(b) reasonable time
  • Search and seizure / garofoli authorizations
  • S.8 charter issues
  • Soira (sex offender information registration) order
  • Curative proviso s.686(1)(b)(iii)
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2024 NSPC 24

R. v. MacKenzie, Guptill

The provincial court judge lacks jurisdiction to quash subpoenas issued under s.698 or to entertain a party's application to excuse subpoenaed witnesses under s.700(2); s.700(2) governs the obligations of subpoenaed persons and only those persons may seek to be excused, therefore the proper remedy to challenge a subpoena is by application to a superior court (certiorari).

  • Section 10(b) right to counsel
  • Subpoena
  • Section 700(2) criminal code
  • Solicitor-client privilege
  • Quash subpoena
  • Abuse of process
Read case analysis
Tort/negligence 2022 FC 1755

Johnson v. Canada

The Federal Court dismissed an inmate’s damages action alleging second-hand smoke exposure at Warkworth Institution from smudging and contraband tobacco.

  • Second-hand smoke
  • Smudging
  • Commissioner’s directive 259
  • Limitation period
  • Duty of care
  • Causation
Read case analysis
Constitutional/charter 2021 NSSC 361

R v Young

On the facts the predominant purpose of the CRA inquiries did not become the determination of penal liability until after the auditors' interviews concluded on October 7, 2015 (and formal CID referral/acceptance occurred in Feb–Jun 2016); therefore Charter ss.7 and 8 were not infringed by the audit conduct and evidence obtained during the audit is admissible.

  • Predominant purpose test (jarvis)
  • Search and seizure (s.8)
  • Principles of fundamental justice (s.7)
  • Admissibility of compelled audit information
  • Civil audit to criminal investigation referral
Read case analysis
Constitutional/charter 2020 NSPC 23

R. v. Alharoun

Constable Haight had both subjective belief and objectively reasonable grounds to arrest based on the totality of factors (speeding rental vehicle, travel direction, timing, blinds/tint, visible cardboard cases with identifying markings and officer interdiction training); the cardboard cases were lawfully observed under the plain view doctrine and opening a case was a lawful search incidental to arrest; Adwan’s s.10 rights were not breached as translator steps were taken promptly; Alharoun experienced a breach of s.10(a) and the implementational component of s.10(b) (delay and failure to faci…

  • Section 8 unreasonable search
  • Section 9 arbitrary detention/arrest
  • Section 10(a)/(b) right to be informed and right to counsel
  • Plain view doctrine
  • Search incidental to arrest
  • Section 24(2) exclusion of evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal 2018 ONCA 959

R. v. Pilon

Both strip searches violated s.8 because they were conducted in the field without demonstrated exigent circumstances justifying a field search, but on a s.24(2) analysis the evidence was not excluded because the violation was not serious in context (police acted in good faith and searches were minimally intrusive), the evidence was highly reliable and society's interest in adjudication on the merits prevailed; accordingly the convictions are upheld and the appeal is dismissed.

  • Strip search
  • Search incident to arrest
  • Exigent circumstances
  • Section 8 charter
  • Section 24(2) charter exclusion
Read case analysis
Criminal 2016 ONCA 141

R. v. Darteh

The Court deferred to the trial judge's factual findings and held that, when viewed in their totality, the objectively discernible facts available to police were capable of grounding a reasonable suspicion that the appellant was committing trespass or liquor-related offences; therefore the detention was not arbitrary under s.9 and the appeal was dismissed.

  • Arbitrary detention
  • Reasonable suspicion
  • Investigative detention
  • Charter s.9
  • Charter s.24(2)
  • Search and seizure
Read case analysis
Immigration 2011 FC 516

Beltran v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

The Federal Court stayed Beltran’s admissibility proceedings, finding a 22-year delay by the state made the process an abuse of process and unfair.

  • Abuse of process
  • Delay
  • Admissibility (security)
  • Natural justice
  • Functus officio
  • Estoppel
Read case analysis
Evidence 2010 ONCA 423

R. v. Prokofiew

Section 4(6) of the Canada Evidence Act, properly interpreted purposively and in light of pre-existing Supreme Court authority, does not bar a trial judge from instructing a jury that an accused’s failure to testify cannot be used as evidence of guilt; so interpreted s.4(6) is constitutional. The trial judge’s omission to give that specific instruction did not amount to reversible error given the full jury charge (presumption of innocence, burden on Crown, evidence-only verdicts) and the context of counsel submissions. The admission of the handwritten notations was harmless in light of overwh…

  • Right to silence
  • Canada evidence act s.4(6)
  • Jury instruction
  • Adverse inference from silence
  • Hearsay (principled exception)
  • Section 11(b) delay
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.