Smithe Residences Ltd., by its receiver, MNP Ltd. v. Boffo Investment Corp.
The court held the Smithe Consulting Agreement replaced the JVA, its profitâsharing waterfall applied to profits from the whole completed Smithe Project (not limited to the plaintiff's proposed Thalia design), the plaintiff did not repudiate the agreement, Boffo Smithe breached by withholding profit shares, and Boffo Investment was unjustly enriched by receipt of those profits; damages awarded under the contract waterfall and unjust enrichment principles.
Source excerpt
- Contractual interpretation
- Repudiation
- Good faith in contractual performance
- Profitâsharing
- Joint venture agreements
- Remedies and damages