Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Contract law 2019 NSSM 57

Heavenly Stairs and Custom Interiors Limited v. 3303743 Nova Scotia Limited

The subcontractor was dismissed for non‑workmanlike performance and therefore is not entitled to lost profit; materials ordered by the subcontractor were procured to satisfy Heavenly Stairs’ contract and so belong to Heavenly Stairs, with the advance offset by proven expenditures and credited returns, resulting in a net award to Heavenly Stairs.

  • Subcontractor liability
  • Advance payment and offsets
  • Return of special‑order materials
  • Lost profits claim
  • Good and workmanlike performance
Read case analysis
Contract law 2017 BCSC 1127

Bulkley Valley Restorations Ltd. v. Thurber

The court found no proved global contract, assessed the claim in quantum meruit, allowed a $1,850 set-off for proven deficiencies, and awarded judgment to the plaintiff.

  • Formation of contract
  • Scope of work
  • Quantum meruit
  • Damages and set-off
  • Expert report admissibility and weight
  • Pre-judgment interest
Read case analysis
Contract law 2015 NSSM 61

England v. Saunders-Todd

The text message exchanges established a binding fixed-price contract for labour at $10,000 (taxes included); the defendants terminated the contract before completion but the work performed was substantial and deficiencies were minor, warranting a $300 abatement; credit for the $5,000 deposit and costs of $199.70 yields a judgment of $4,899.70 for the claimant.

  • Formation of contract
  • Breach of contract
  • Damages and abatement for deficiencies
  • Use of electronic communications as contract evidence
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2008 NSSC 310

Force Construction Ltd. v. Campbell

The judge exercised the broad discretion conferred by the Civil Procedure Rules, found that both parties equally contributed to the need for trial and achieved mixed success, declined to apply Rule 41A in this case, and ordered that each party bear their own costs, disbursements and pre-judgment interest.

  • Costs
  • Rule 41a offers
  • Disbursements
  • Pre-judgment interest
  • Judicial discretion on costs
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.