Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Family law 2024 BCSC 2455

S.H. v. M.A.H.

The court rejected a duress claim and increased the father’s parenting time from two to three 24-hour periods per month, subject to OT-related conditions.

  • Parenting time
  • Settlement agreement
  • Duress
  • Best interests of the child
  • S. 211 family reports
  • Interim order
Read case analysis
Family law 2015 BCSC 2068

Connors v. Walsh

The court dismissed a spousal support application, holding a full and final settlement with an express waiver barred relief and no statutory basis existed to set it aside.

  • Enforceability of minutes of settlement
  • Setting aside agreements (s.164 fla)
  • Initial spousal support orders (s.15 divorce act)
  • Waiver of support
  • Pension valuation
  • Costs discretion
Read case analysis
Family law 2008 BCSC 1179

Samson v. Samson

The court held the parties were bound by their Minutes of Settlement, so the plaintiff could not bring original child and spousal support motions and the defendant could not unilaterally vary payments.

  • Minutes of settlement
  • Review of support
  • Enforcement of maintenance
  • Imputation of income
  • Shared parenting
  • Family-law
Read case analysis
Family law 2008 ONCA 543

DeMarco v. DeMarco

Leave was properly denied because the motion judge found the appellant had a flagrant and persistent history of disobeying court orders and there was conflicting evidence about whether a final binding settlement existed; given those facts the exercise of discretion by the motion judge was not susceptible to appellate interference.

  • Leave to bring motion
  • Binding settlement agreement
  • Possession orders
  • Judicial discretion
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Family law 2005 BCSC 1488

J.H.M. v. L.D.M.

The court dismissed cross-applications over a family settlement, holding there was insufficient evidence to assess the fairness of the Minutes of Settlement.

  • Settlement agreement
  • Fairness review
  • Spousal support
  • Division of property
  • Pension division
  • Consent orders
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.