Kalinin v. Arnold
The court found the tenant was responsible for maintaining electrical service under the lease; the tenant allowed a two-month loss of power which interfered with the landlord's possession and posed safety and property risk, thereby breaching the statutory condition against interfering with possession under s 9(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act; accordingly the Director's termination order was upheld, with a limited modification to the vacate date.
Source excerpt
- Termination of tenancy
- Maintenance of utilities
- Interference with possession
- Lease interpretation
- Remedy - eviction