Bayliss v. Burnham
The motions judge properly applied the elevated Rule 30.10 test: GRE's financial records were relevant to a material issue (valuation of the estate's 12.5% share and related testamentary and dependency issues) and disclosure was necessary for fairness; the judge appropriately tailored the order and implemented a Confidentiality Protocol to mitigate prejudice, and the Court of Appeal will not interfere with that discretionary case-management decision.
Source excerpt
- Non-party document production
- Rule 30.10
- Valuation of estate assets
- Confidentiality protocol
- Appellate review of discretionary motions
- Relevance and fairness in disclosure