Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Family law 2017 BCSC 2289

Sangha v. Sangha

The court found disputed corporate shares were family assets, reapportioned them in the wife’s favour, ordered compensation and a charge, and awarded special costs.

  • Division of family assets
  • Spousal support (retroactive lump sum)
  • Reapportionment under s.65 fra
  • Compensation order and charging order under s.66 fra
  • Special costs and s.92 penalty
  • Issue estoppel and abuse of process
Read case analysis
Family law 2013 BCSC 217

Aquilini v. Aquilini

The court refused to order pre-trial sale of a wine collection, declined to expand a restraining order, and held adultery discovery unnecessary in a separation-based divorce.

  • Division of family assets
  • Interim sale of assets
  • Restraining orders (s.67 fra)
  • Discovery and privilege
  • Adultery allegation and relevance
  • Document production from corporate entities
Read case analysis
Tax law 2011 TCC 383

1207192 Ontario Limited v. The Queen

The court found that although creditor‑proofing was a legitimate objective, the specific step of subscribing for common shares and then effecting a stock dividend to shift value to low‑PUC high‑redemption preferred shares, followed by sale of the under‑valued common shares to a family trust, was undertaken primarily to create a tax loss; those transactions lacked economic substance in relation to the purpose of the capital loss provisions and therefore constituted abusive tax avoidance under s.245(4), so the reassessment was upheld and the appeal dismissed.

  • General anti‑avoidance rule (gaar)
  • Capital loss recognition
  • Creditor‑proofing structures
  • Stock dividends and value shift
  • Affiliated persons/stop‑loss rules
  • Abusive tax avoidance
Read case analysis
Tax law 2011 TCC 259

Triad Gestco Ltd. v. The Queen

The series of transactions produced a clear tax benefit by offsetting a recent capital gain with a manufactured capital loss; key steps (value shift by stock dividend, creation of the trust and sale to that trust) were avoidance transactions not undertaken primarily for bona fide non‑tax purposes and, read contextually and purposively, frustrated the object, spirit and purpose of the capital loss and stop‑loss provisions; therefore GAAR (s.245) applies and the claimed loss is denied.

  • General anti-avoidance rule (gaar)
  • Capital gains and losses
  • Stop-loss/superficial loss rules
  • Estate freeze/reverse freeze
Read case analysis
Family law 2003 BCCA 130

P. (R. E.) v. P. (M.)

The Court of Appeal varied the property division to equalize the farm, upheld the treatment of most inheritance and company assets, and dismissed the maintenance appeal.

  • Division of family assets
  • Reapportionment under family relations act ss.56 and 65
  • Treatment of corporate assets and shares s.58(3)
  • Characterization of inheritance
  • Spousal maintenance
  • Family-property-division
Read case analysis
Taxation [1953] 2 SCR 389

Minister of National Revenue v. Independence Founders Ltd.

The Supreme Court of Canada held that profits from buying and reselling Trust Shares were taxable income because the transactions were part of the respondent’s business, not passive capital gains.

  • Capital versus income
  • Trading in securities
  • Trust arrangements
  • Foreign exchange regulation impact
  • Taxation
  • Income-tax
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.