Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The court granted a brief adjournment of an examination in aid of execution, imposed conditions for written requests and sworn responses, and set a January 31, 2026 minimum reset date.
The Federal Court dismissed KRBL Limited’s motion for more time to answer a status review and dismissed the trademark action for delay.
The Court of Appeal upheld territorial competence in a debt claim, but held the defendants had not attorned by filing a jurisdictional response after the 30-day period.
The Court of Appeal upheld the registrar’s refusal to permit limited transcripts, finding the appeal issues were fact-rich and required the full trial record.
The Court of Appeal granted British Columbia leave to file two factums in consolidated opioid litigation appeals, but treated the order as provisional and cautioned against excessive filings.
Leave to file the five‑page reply factum was granted because the request was reasonable, unopposed, addressed matters the appellant had no opportunity to address in its main factum due to those issues not being decided below, and a brief reply will assist the panel’s pre‑hearing understanding while avoiding unnecessary costs; the judge also concluded that rules should be amended to permit brief automatic reply factums (five pages) to improve efficiency.
Source excerpt
The appeal was allowed because the appropriate remedy was to set aside the Federal Court decision and permit the appellant to serve and file the Application Record electronically, including the Certified Tribunal Record, within 20 days in accordance with the Federal Court Practice Direction Update #7; costs of the appeal were fixed at $300 inclusive.
Source excerpt
The court denied a media consortium’s request to video record and broadcast the double criminality portion of Wanzhou Meng’s extradition hearing.
The court held that the petitioner could not unilaterally adjourn the scheduled hearing. It adjourned the application, imposed limits on related hearings, and awarded nominal costs.
The court held the actions were not fast track litigation under Rule 15-1, so the defendants could proceed with jury trials and the plaintiff’s strike application failed.
Explore more
